2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Evolution of Grass Stomata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
182
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
182
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All 63 query Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) guard cell genes and 23 gene families are from Chen et al (2017). Genome sequence data were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Ensembl Plants (http://plants.…”
Section: Evolutionary Bioinformatics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All 63 query Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) guard cell genes and 23 gene families are from Chen et al (2017). Genome sequence data were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Ensembl Plants (http://plants.…”
Section: Evolutionary Bioinformatics Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land plants acquired stomata to regulate gas exchange by opening and closing of the stomatal pore (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003;Berry et al, 2010;Chater et al, 2011). While liverworts lack stomata, mosses and most other land plants have a typical stomatal pore surrounded by at least a pair of guard cells (Franks and Farquhar, 2007;Chen et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the ever-growing multitude of genomic data from representative species spanning the land plant phylogeny, in silico analyses are becoming an increasingly popular means of discussing physiological evolution (Pabón-Mora et al, 2014;Yue et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2016). Stomatal evolution, however, provides some excellent examples of why gene phylogenies should always be used in combination with experimental studies of stomatal behavior in situ.…”
Section: Ongoing Questions In the Field Of Stomatal Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies hypothesize that, before the evolution of seed plants, stomatal control, particularly in response to water deficit, was largely hydropassive (referred to here as the passive origin model, after Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; also described as the gradualistic model in McAdam and Brodribb, 2012). This hypothesis has been rejected in a number of studies utilizing a variety of methods, including cross-species genetic complementation, bioinformatics, and leaf gasexchange measurements, which together suggest that active stomatal sensitivity to ABA and CO 2 are traits common to all major land plant divisions Ruszala et al, 2011;Lind et al, 2015;Franks and Britton-Harper, 2016;Cai et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stomata Evolved As Land Plants Diversified But All Plant DImentioning
confidence: 99%