2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-010-9591-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular evidence of genetic diversity changes in pea (Pisum sativum L.) germplasm after long-term maintenance

Abstract: Maintaining germplasm genetic integrity is a key objective of long-term ex situ conservation. Periodic regeneration, performed on limited plots with small number of individuals, increases the risk of genetic drift and genetic diversity changes. In this study, six accessions of white flowered, dry seed pea varieties (Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. sativum): Bohatýr, Klatovský zelený, Hanák, Moravský hrotovický krajový, Raman and Viktoria-75 and four accessions of colour flowered, fodder pea (P. sativum su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
17
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
17
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, they were obtained from genebanks where they have certainly undergone several cycles of regeneration. Depletion of genetic diversity throughout successive regenerations of accessions has been demonstrated elsewhere (Cieslarová et al, 2011). Genetic diversity indices (Ho and He) and fixation index (F) estimated in this study were close to those reported from several previous studies based on SSR markers (Nantoumé et al, 2013;Gbotto et al, 2015) and were generally low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, they were obtained from genebanks where they have certainly undergone several cycles of regeneration. Depletion of genetic diversity throughout successive regenerations of accessions has been demonstrated elsewhere (Cieslarová et al, 2011). Genetic diversity indices (Ho and He) and fixation index (F) estimated in this study were close to those reported from several previous studies based on SSR markers (Nantoumé et al, 2013;Gbotto et al, 2015) and were generally low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This study investigated changes in the genetic diversity of pea genetic resources over the period of 70 years by the analysis of microsatellite (SSR) and retrotransposon (RBIP) markers, while in our previous study we examined the genetic erosion in ex situ collections, as a result of regeneration and storage practices (Cieslarová et al 2011a). We focused on pea genetic resources, where there is a limited possibility of in situ conservation and thus only ex situ germplasm collections are the essential reservoir for pea genetic diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously we investigated changes in the genetic integrity of pea collection in the process of germplasm maintenance (Cieslarová et al 2011a) and reported an evidence of genetic erosion. This study focuses on the temporal diversity changes in the Czech/Czechoslovak pea germplasm collection as assessed by microsatellite and retrotransposon markers in three time periods spanning the 70 years of pea breeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, genebank accessions collected across several decades showed no consistent loss of genetic diversity, and we found both high-and low-level genetic diversity in different accessions collected at the same time. In contrast, loss of genetic diversity in pea accessions during genebank maintenance has previously been reported in a study of Czechoslovak pea landraces and cultivars (Cieslarová et al, 2010). The low-diversity NordGen accessions can be because of either low diversity of the source populations or the sampling procedures during the genebank donation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%