“…Sixty-three articles of sixy-four case–control studies [ 15–17 , 19 , 21–24 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 38–42 , 45 , 47 , 48–52 , 54–58 , 62–64 , 67–70 , 73 , 74 , 76–78 , 80–82 , 87–90 , 93 , 96–99 , 102 , 105 , 109 , 111–114 ] were eligible concerning the GSTT1 present/null polymorphism (19,725 cases and 28,725 controls; 34 studies on Caucasians, 23 on Asians, one on Indians, one on Africans, and five on mixed populations) with CRC risk. Thirty-two publications of thirty-three case–control studies [ 15 , 19 , 22–24 , 27 , 31 , 33 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 49 , 52 , 55–57 , 63 , 67 , 68 , 70 , 76–78 , 90 , 96 , 97 , 99 , 105 , 109 , 112 ] were included regarding their combined effects (8270 cases and 14,381 controls; 11 studies on Caucasians, 17 on Asians, one on Indians, one on Africans, and three on mixed populations) with CRC risk. Fifty-five studies had a quality score ≥ 6 and the remaining 31 had a quality score < 6 regarding the GSTM1 present/null polymorphism; 48 high-quality studies were examined and the remaining 16 were low-quality concerning the GSTT1 present/null polymorphism; a total of 25 high-quality and eight low-quality studies were included on their combined effects with CRC risk.…”