1998
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.36.12.3629-3635.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Epidemiology of Ampicillin-Resistant Non-β-Lactamase-Producing Haemophilus influenzae

Abstract: Resistance to ampicillin without β-lactamase production is not a frequent occurrence among Haemophilus influenzaestrains. This kind of resistance is encountered in unencapsulated strains isolated from bronchial secretions and ear, nose, and throat specimens and is exceptional in H. influenzae type b. We studied 29 of these strains from various areas in France and 2 reference strains. Strains were compared by using ribotyping, arbitarily primed PCR with two primers, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Each te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of ampicillin resistance among H. influenzae isolates not producing β‐lactamase was 2.27%, consistent with reported rates [13,30]. This resistance in isolation affected principally the activity of cefaclor, with lesser effects on the activity of cefuroxime–axetil, ceftriaxone and cefpodoxime [34–37], but strains with this type of resistance did not seem to have major clinical consequences [38]. For our isolates, the MIC of erythromycin in the erythromycin–sulfisoxazole combination was lower than that of erythromycin alone, but higher than the plateau level of about 1.1 mg/L obtained for samples of middle ear effusion [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The frequency of ampicillin resistance among H. influenzae isolates not producing β‐lactamase was 2.27%, consistent with reported rates [13,30]. This resistance in isolation affected principally the activity of cefaclor, with lesser effects on the activity of cefuroxime–axetil, ceftriaxone and cefpodoxime [34–37], but strains with this type of resistance did not seem to have major clinical consequences [38]. For our isolates, the MIC of erythromycin in the erythromycin–sulfisoxazole combination was lower than that of erythromycin alone, but higher than the plateau level of about 1.1 mg/L obtained for samples of middle ear effusion [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…PFGE analysis revealed that the population of isolates with altered PBPs in Poland is diverse, as has been described previously for non‐typeable BLNAR isolates [29–31]. However, the identification of isolates with the same or very similar PFGE patterns, not only from patients attending the same hospital, but also from different parts of the country, suggests possible clonal spread of isolates with altered PBPs, as has been observed previously [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…They also studied the strains using other molecular biology tools, ribotyping and arbitrarily primed PCR with two primers, and each technique gave nearly the same number of different patterns as PFGE. However, ribotyping is more fastidious and time-consuming than arbitrarily primed PCR and PFGE (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%