2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular ecology meets systematic conservation planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developing systematic conservation plans depends on a wealth of information on a region's biodiversity (Margules & Pressey, 2000; Nielson et al, 2022). Knowing what species occur where is a pre‐requisite for implementing any sort of broad systematic approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing systematic conservation plans depends on a wealth of information on a region's biodiversity (Margules & Pressey, 2000; Nielson et al, 2022). Knowing what species occur where is a pre‐requisite for implementing any sort of broad systematic approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now with increased technology and data accumulation, intraspecific diversity can be studied in the same way as species diversity. Understanding the distribution of genetic diversity is important for providing insights on the spatial distribution of biodiversity, with implications for conservation planning (De Kort et al, 2021; Lawrence & Fraser, 2020; Leigh et al, 2021; Nielsen et al, 2022; Theodoridis et al, 2020). As a growing field, ‘macrogenetics’ – the study of genetic diversity at broad scales (Blanchet et al, 2017) – thus far has revealed that genetic diversity spatial patterns are weaker, loci specific (e.g., neutral microsatellites vs. adaptive genes), taxa‐specific or in contrast to species diversity (Adams & Hadly, 2013; Habrich et al, 2021; Manel et al, 2020; Millette et al, 2020; Miraldo et al, 2016; Schmidt et al, 2022; Theodoridis et al, 2020; Yiming et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although uncertainties remain in the detection of SNPs associated with local adaptation, outlier detection methods, and their downstream analyses are attracting growing interest in the basic science and environmental management communities. While these genomic approaches are not easy to implement for many wild populations (particularly those lacking annotated genomes), they offer the opportunity to refine efforts for the management and conservation of species and to identify the populations with the greatest risk of decline due to climate and other anthropogenic changes (Hoffmann et al, 2015; Meek et al, 2023; Nielsen et al, 2023). Further experimental research and in situ studies are required to verify the importance of these gene regions for local adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses of species to environmental changes should also involve the understanding of evolutionary processes (Bernatchez, 2016). This approach allows for better understanding of changes in genetic diversity, genetic structure, migration patterns and the evolutionary potential of populations (Bernatchez, 2016; Davis et al, 2005; Gerber et al, 2014; Hodapp et al, 2023), that support evidence‐based decision‐making to manage marine resources (Nielsen et al, 2021, 2023). Changes in the distributional ranges of exploited species are particularly important in a management context, since they may negatively affect the biomass of the exploited resources and impact human livelihoods (Möllmann et al, 2021; Ovenden et al, 2015; Pecl et al, 2017; Pinsky & Palumbi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%