2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-021-02482-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics study on water evaporation/condensation parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] and [27] also evaluated the distribution function at points similar to those chosen by Refs. [30] and [31] and the results match well. Furthermore, nonequilibrium thermodynamic analysis has shown that the temperature of the liquid-vapor interface is very close to the temperature of the bulk liquid adjacent to the interface [32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[26] and [27] also evaluated the distribution function at points similar to those chosen by Refs. [30] and [31] and the results match well. Furthermore, nonequilibrium thermodynamic analysis has shown that the temperature of the liquid-vapor interface is very close to the temperature of the bulk liquid adjacent to the interface [32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Frezzotti and Barbante also observed the half-range Maxwellian from their Enskog-Vlasov model calculations [28]. We note that other MD studies appear to contradict these findings [29][30][31], but the discrepancy appears to arise only from the choice of interphase boundary position. References [26] and [27] evaluated the distribution function at the center of the transition layer (the angstrom-scale region where the density transitions from liquid to vapor) while Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the water accommodation coefficient (α) was calculated by tracking the trajectory and phase-state of water molecules during a 100 ns trajectory for each simulated system. We note that even based on atomistic trajectories determined using MD simulations, there are several possible ways of defining whether an impinging water molecule is absorbed or reflected and, as a result, different reported α-values (ranging from 0.9 to 1.0) even for the flat surface of pure liquid water (Julin et al, 2013;Barclay and Lukes, 2019;Skarbalius et al, 2021;Tsuruta and Nagayama, 2004;Ohashi et al, 2020). To highlight the impacts of curvature, salinity, and organic coatings on α and compare our results with those of other studies, we report normalized values as α * = α/α 0,w , where α 0,w is the value reported for the flat surface of pure liquid water in the same study.…”
Section: Accommodation Coefficient Of Water and Condensation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[57] and are listed in Table 1. The long-range electrostatic interactions beyond the cut-off distance were handled by the Particle-particle particle-mesh (PPPM) method with the accuracy of 2 × 10 −5 [58]. To avoid unphysical slab-slab interactions, the system was treated as periodic in z-direction; however, an empty volume was inserted between the channel walls and dipole inter-slab interactions were removed.…”
Section: Poiseuille Flow Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%