1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.48.8253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular-dynamics study of the binding energy and melting of transition-metal clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
98
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
98
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been some controversy concerning the dependence of the simulated thermodynamic properties on the ensemble until the work by Calvo and Labastie [17]. These authors [17] showed that if the sampling of the phase space is accurate enough (a large enough number of MC configurations and MD trajectories), the thermodynamic results are identical in both ensembles because the thermodynamics is determined by the configurational density of states [7,8,17,18].In this Letter, we show that the potential energy distribution of atoms in the clusters can consistently explain many of the important phenomena which occur during phase changes of small clusters, such as the nonmonotonic variation of melting temperature with the size of clusters [3,6,7], the dependence of melting, boiling, and sublimation temperatures on the interatomic potentials [12,13,19], the existence of a surface-melted phase [6,8,11,15,16], and the absence of a premelting peak in heat capacity curves [9,[14][15][16].We have studied the thermodynamic behavior of clusters of metals and nonmetals for the sizes of 12 # n # 34. For the interatomic interactions, we have employed the tight-binding potentials based on the second moment approximation [7,16] for metal clusters (M n , M Ni, Cu, Pd, Ag, Pt, Au, Al, and Pb) and pair potentials for nonmetal clusters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There has been some controversy concerning the dependence of the simulated thermodynamic properties on the ensemble until the work by Calvo and Labastie [17]. These authors [17] showed that if the sampling of the phase space is accurate enough (a large enough number of MC configurations and MD trajectories), the thermodynamic results are identical in both ensembles because the thermodynamics is determined by the configurational density of states [7,8,17,18].In this Letter, we show that the potential energy distribution of atoms in the clusters can consistently explain many of the important phenomena which occur during phase changes of small clusters, such as the nonmonotonic variation of melting temperature with the size of clusters [3,6,7], the dependence of melting, boiling, and sublimation temperatures on the interatomic potentials [12,13,19], the existence of a surface-melted phase [6,8,11,15,16], and the absence of a premelting peak in heat capacity curves [9,[14][15][16].We have studied the thermodynamic behavior of clusters of metals and nonmetals for the sizes of 12 # n # 34. For the interatomic interactions, we have employed the tight-binding potentials based on the second moment approximation [7,16] for metal clusters (M n , M Ni, Cu, Pd, Ag, Pt, Au, Al, and Pb) and pair potentials for nonmetal clusters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In this Letter, we show that the potential energy distribution of atoms in the clusters can consistently explain many of the important phenomena which occur during phase changes of small clusters, such as the nonmonotonic variation of melting temperature with the size of clusters [3,6,7], the dependence of melting, boiling, and sublimation temperatures on the interatomic potentials [12,13,19], the existence of a surface-melted phase [6,8,11,15,16], and the absence of a premelting peak in heat capacity curves [9,[14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations