2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulations to understand glycosaminoglycan interactions in the free- and protein-bound states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a number of MD studies on GAGs in water have been performed using three major forcefields, including GLYCAM, CHARMM and GROMOS [29] . Considerable insights into glycosidic torsional angles, ring puckers, inter-atomic interactions, intermolecular interactions and global shapes of GAG chains have been derived from these studies [38] . In fact, recent studies on large number of GAG disaccharides have further confirmed the classic works by Mulloy and co-workers [31] that glycosidic torsions Φ and Ψ vary within a relatively small range irrespective of sulfation pattern [39] , [40] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of MD studies on GAGs in water have been performed using three major forcefields, including GLYCAM, CHARMM and GROMOS [29] . Considerable insights into glycosidic torsional angles, ring puckers, inter-atomic interactions, intermolecular interactions and global shapes of GAG chains have been derived from these studies [38] . In fact, recent studies on large number of GAG disaccharides have further confirmed the classic works by Mulloy and co-workers [31] that glycosidic torsions Φ and Ψ vary within a relatively small range irrespective of sulfation pattern [39] , [40] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Also, the GAG−protein interactions, either specific or nonspecific, are mainly ionic, along with hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions. 1,21 Proteins that interact with GAG are classified majorly into two groups; chemokines 22−24 and growth factors. 25,26 Examples include highly specific antithrombin (AT)−heparin interactions illuminating the anticoagulant nature of heparin 2 and GAG modulations of chemokines.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, depending on the range of flexibility and conformational freedom of the GAG upon binding to the protein, may be also called either plastic or non-selective binding. 24 RS-REMD simulations were also performed for 1BFC system with additional potential functions imposed on dihedral angles that compose glycosidic linkages, to check if additionally allowed flexibility of the GAG chains could lead to the improvement of the docking results. With subsequently higher replicas, the height of the energy barrier decreased.…”
Section: Rs-remd Docking Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the GAGs observed in computational studies often reveal high mobility and plasticity of the binding on the protein surface 24,46 the results should be interpreted essentially differently than when analyzing binding of small drug molecules. During conventional MD runs starting from the crystal structure with the same force field parameters, observed GAG RMSD (using the crystal structure as a reference) was 4.1 Å ± 0.6 for the 1BFC complex, 5.2 ± 1.2 Å for the 2AXM dimer complex and 1.4 ± 0.3 Å for the 1E03 complex.…”
Section: Rs-remd Docking Performancementioning
confidence: 99%