2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulations study for the effect of cations hydration on the surface tension of the electrolyte solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For different interlayer cations, the maximum adsorption energy of cement-stabilized MMT displays the order Na-MMT > K-MMT > Ca-MMT > Mg-MMT, as summarized in Table . While the adsorption energy of pure MMT has been reported to have a different descending order of Mg-MMT > Ca-MMT > Na-MMT > K-MMT. , This might be due to the influence of CSH layers. In addition, when the interlayer cations are divalent ions (Ca and Mg), the adsorption energy of MMT is lower than that of monovalent ions (Na and K) in the interlayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For different interlayer cations, the maximum adsorption energy of cement-stabilized MMT displays the order Na-MMT > K-MMT > Ca-MMT > Mg-MMT, as summarized in Table . While the adsorption energy of pure MMT has been reported to have a different descending order of Mg-MMT > Ca-MMT > Na-MMT > K-MMT. , This might be due to the influence of CSH layers. In addition, when the interlayer cations are divalent ions (Ca and Mg), the adsorption energy of MMT is lower than that of monovalent ions (Na and K) in the interlayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While the adsorption energy of pure MMT has been reported to have a different descending order of Mg-MMT > Ca-MMT > Na-MMT > K-MMT. 60,61 This might be due to the influence of CSH layers. In addition, when the interlayer cations are divalent ions (Ca and Mg), the adsorption energy of MMT is lower than that of monovalent ions (Na and K) in the interlayer.…”
Section: Adsorption Energy Of Csh−mmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be explained by the different counter ion. 44,45 Measurements of fluorescence were carried out on the polymer solutions neutralized in the two different ways in order to estimate the CMC values (Fig. 8) of the polymer solutions.…”
Section: Surface Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When doping Ca, the foreign atoms act as a modifying agent, which changes not only the surface energy but also the mobility and reaction kinetics as they exhibit different hydration energy and diffusivity when compared to Li + ions. First, due to the more negative hydration enthalpy of Ca 2+ (−1577 kJ mol −1 ) as compared to Li + (−520 kJ mol −1 ), the absorbed Ca 2+ could lower the reaction surface energy by enhancing the lattice surface tension of Li 3 VO 4 30 . This energy also reflects the fact that the stronger binding of Ca sites with water molecules inhibits further crystallization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%