Protein Folding Handbook 2005
DOI: 10.1002/9783527619498.ch33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proteins and Peptides: Problems, Achievements, and Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These force fields model the electrostatic signatures of molecules or of molecular fragments by static partial charges localized at the atoms and, therefore, can account for the effects of electronic polarization only by the mean field approximation, which is highly questionable for inhomogeneous and non-isotropic biomolecular systems. 7 There are notable exceptions which combined a polarizable force field for the MM fragment with semiempirical quantum chemistry for the QM fragment. [8][9][10][11][12] Combinations of higher-level QM treatments (density functional a) Electronic mail: gerald.mathias@physik.uni-muenchen.de theory 13,14 (DFT) or ab initio quantum chemistry) with PMM force fields were either restricted to the energetics of static systems, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] to small molecular clusters, [24][25][26][27][28][29] or describe the dynamics only in parts of the simulation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These force fields model the electrostatic signatures of molecules or of molecular fragments by static partial charges localized at the atoms and, therefore, can account for the effects of electronic polarization only by the mean field approximation, which is highly questionable for inhomogeneous and non-isotropic biomolecular systems. 7 There are notable exceptions which combined a polarizable force field for the MM fragment with semiempirical quantum chemistry for the QM fragment. [8][9][10][11][12] Combinations of higher-level QM treatments (density functional a) Electronic mail: gerald.mathias@physik.uni-muenchen.de theory 13,14 (DFT) or ab initio quantum chemistry) with PMM force fields were either restricted to the energetics of static systems, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] to small molecular clusters, [24][25][26][27][28][29] or describe the dynamics only in parts of the simulation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes of protein folding and aggregation sensitively depend on the thermodynamic conditions and on a subtle balance of the electrostatic interactions within the proteinsolvent system (Warshel and Russell, 1984) which, therefore, have to be adequately represented in MD simulations (Tavan et al, 2005). To generate a well-defined thermodynamic ensemble in MD, one has to enclose the protein and a small (3-to 8-nm) neighborhood of solvent molecules by periodic boundaries (Allen and Tildesley, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate a well-defined thermodynamic ensemble in MD, one has to enclose the protein and a small (3-to 8-nm) neighborhood of solvent molecules by periodic boundaries (Allen and Tildesley, 1987). For an adequate treatment of the electrostatic interactions one has to apply either Ewald (Frenkel and Smit, 2002) or movingboundary reaction-field techniques (Mathias et al, 2003;Mathias and Tavan, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation systems addressing the bulk liquid should comprise several thousand water molecules and corresponding MD simulations should cover several nanoseconds , for well-sampled computations of properties such as the dielectric constant. Here, DFT and other methods of quantum chemistry are excluded for reasons of computational manageability , and one must resort to less accurate but computationally much more efficient and preferentially polarizable , molecular mechanics (PMM) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%