2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulations and experimental study of the effects of an ionic surfactant on the wettability of low-rank coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased hydrophilicity of the adsorbent surface caused by surfactants adsorption suggests that it occurs preferentially through the hydrocarbon tails with the polar heads of surfactants facing the aqueous phase. This agrees with the increase in wettability of carbonaceous materials promoted by the adsorption of surfactants highlighted by molecular dynamics studies (Liu et al 2020 ; Jin et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The increased hydrophilicity of the adsorbent surface caused by surfactants adsorption suggests that it occurs preferentially through the hydrocarbon tails with the polar heads of surfactants facing the aqueous phase. This agrees with the increase in wettability of carbonaceous materials promoted by the adsorption of surfactants highlighted by molecular dynamics studies (Liu et al 2020 ; Jin et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To further explore the adsorption morphology distribution of AEO 9 on the anthracite surface, the relative concentration distribution of AEO 9 at the hydrophilic end and hydrophobic end was determined. Figure shows that AEO 9 is mainly distributed on the anthracite surface in the range of 20–40 Å, indicating that the surfactants form a dense network structure and are concentrated at the anthracite/H 2 O interface. , In combination with Figure , there is little difference between the peak positions of hydrophilic and hydrophobic sites of AEO 9 . The hydrophilic group peak appears at 33 Å and the hydrophobic peak appears at 31 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Figure 10 shows that AEO 9 is mainly distributed on the anthracite surface in the range of 20−40 Å, indicating that the surfactants form a dense network structure and are concentrated at the anthracite/H 2 O interface. 35,36 In combination with Figure 10, there is little difference between the peak positions of hydrophilic and hydrophobic sites of AEO 9 . The hydrophilic group peak appears at 33 Å and the hydrophobic peak appears at 31 Å.…”
Section: Dynamic Simulation Analysis 341 Electrostatic Potential Anal...mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The optimal mole ratios of D–DDAB and MO–DDAB are both 9:1. When the dosage of DDAB continues to increase, the cumulative combustible recovery begins to decline, which may be due to the fact that DDAB solution is characterized by high viscosity, and when its concentration is too high, the dispersion of reagents will be weakened, thus reducing the adsorption effect of reagents on mineral surfaces and resulting in a poor flotation effect . When the amount of the mixed collector is more than 3000 g/t, the increase in cumulative combustible recovery is not obvious, but the cleaned coal ash increases slightly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substance composition and properties of coal molecules and collector solutions in this study can be distributed by whole atoms using this force field, which is consistent with what has been reported in other literature reports. 26 , 27 The shape optimization method was the Smart algorithm. After 5000 steps of iterative calculation, the geometrically optimized energy minimization model was obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%