2015
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20159202013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulation of vapour-liquid nucleation of water with constant energy

Abstract: Abstract. The paper describes molecular dynamics study of nucleation of water in NVE ensemble. The numerical simulation was performed with the DL_POLY. The metastable steam consisting of 10976 water molecules with TIP4P/2005 potential was driven on the desired energy level by a simulation at constant temperature, and then the nucleation at constant energy was studied for several tens of nanoseconds, which was sufficient for clusters to evolve at hundred molecules size. The results were compared with the previo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Realistic, atmospheric nucleation rates are too low to be possible in direct computer simulations, due to the large number of molecules required. The lowest water nucleation rates performed in simulations and reported in the literature are ∼ 10 23−24 cm −3 s −1 [1,2], usually beyond the spinodal limit. Laboratory water nucleation rates on the other hand are far lower -usually < 10 10 cm −3 s −1 , although a few experiments have managed to measure far higher rates ∼ 10 17 cm −3 s −1 [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Realistic, atmospheric nucleation rates are too low to be possible in direct computer simulations, due to the large number of molecules required. The lowest water nucleation rates performed in simulations and reported in the literature are ∼ 10 23−24 cm −3 s −1 [1,2], usually beyond the spinodal limit. Laboratory water nucleation rates on the other hand are far lower -usually < 10 10 cm −3 s −1 , although a few experiments have managed to measure far higher rates ∼ 10 17 cm −3 s −1 [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Water is significantly more demanding. For the same system size, more complicated molecular interaction potentials like SPC/E [33][34][35] and TIP4P [2,36,37] necessitate a few orders of magnitude more computational power than a pure Lennard-Jones simulation. An exception is mW water, a comparatively simple monoatomic single-site water model [38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15,18,19 Water nucleation has also been studied with computer simulations. [20][21][22][23][24][25] Probably the most advanced simulations were reported by Angélil et al, 24 who performed large scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using up to ∼4 · 10 6 particles covering a supersaturation range of S ∼ 3-24. This allowed the retrieval of nucleation rates down to ∼10 19 cm −3 s −1 , i.e., very close to the highest experimentally measured rates of ∼10 17 cm −3 s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focused on the effect of ions, reference runs with pure water were considered for the present comparison. An NVE study of water nucleation has been performed by Dusˇka et al, 43…”
Section: Survey Of Molecular Simulation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An NVE study of water nucleation has been performed by Duška et al., 43 who simulated 10,976 water molecules modelled by the TIP4P/2005 force field. A single run at temperature of 347.28 K and pressure of 69.82 kPa yielded a nucleation rate of (2.03 ± 0.28) × 10 29 m −3 s −1 .…”
Section: Nucleation Rate Data From Molecular Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%