2010
DOI: 10.1007/bf03246015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulation of potassium along the liquid-vapor coexistence curve

Abstract: The applicability of pair potential functions to liquid alkali metals is questionable. On the one hand, some recent reports in the literature suggest the validity of two-parameter pair-wise additive Lennard-Jones (LJ) potentials for liquid alkali metals. On the other hand, there are some reports suggesting the inaccuracy of pair potential functions for liquid metals. In this work, we have performed extensive molecular dynamics simulations of vapor-liquid phase equilibria in potassium to check the validity of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that liquid metals do not obey a simple pair potential , like the LJ(12–6) potential employed here. However, adopting liquid potassium as a typical example, for which the temperature-dependent LJ(12–6) parameters are reported in the literature, the ε values range from 4.5 to 14.5 kJ mol –1 . These values are obtained on the basis of a comparison of the melting temperature in the zero-pressure limit ( T m = 337 K) and the critical temperature ( T C = 2280 K) with the melting temperature ( T m = 0.62) and critical temperature ( T C = 1.3) of the LJ(12–6) fluid, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that liquid metals do not obey a simple pair potential , like the LJ(12–6) potential employed here. However, adopting liquid potassium as a typical example, for which the temperature-dependent LJ(12–6) parameters are reported in the literature, the ε values range from 4.5 to 14.5 kJ mol –1 . These values are obtained on the basis of a comparison of the melting temperature in the zero-pressure limit ( T m = 337 K) and the critical temperature ( T C = 2280 K) with the melting temperature ( T m = 0.62) and critical temperature ( T C = 1.3) of the LJ(12–6) fluid, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A severe limitation of the theoretical approaches for studying fluid metals is the lack of accurate pair potential energy functions describing their interatomic interactions. , In fact, no reliable theoretical method is available to derive an effective potential function that describes liquid alkali metals accurately. Even, inconsistencies between predictions of various potential models are reported. , It is known, however, that a class of potentials based on embedded atom models (EAM) are successful in predicting physical properties of liquid metals .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this concept, a number of effective density-dependent potentials have been suggested in the literature for alkali metals. 4,9,10 It is known that potentials based on embedded atom models (EAM), in which the potential energy of metal is composed of a pairwise additive contribution plus an embedding contribution, depending on the effective electron density, are successful in predicting physical properties of liquid metals. 11−13 In this respect, Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations on liquid sodium are done using the EAM potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that such a potential must be a function of the electron density, and hence, of the metal density. On the basis of this concept, a number of effective density-dependent potentials have been suggested in the literature for alkali metals. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%