1999
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Double Proton Transfer: Adenine–Thymine Base Pair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, barrier and reaction energies are similar to values of Gorb et al and Noguera et al for the concerted mechanism, and those of Xiao et al for the sptewise mechanism, shown in Table . In summary, our quantum values of reaction and activation energies are within the ranges that derive from published by other authors, specifically, from 10 to 14 kcal/mol for the reaction energy and of 12–23 kcal/mol for the energy barrier. Another concordance between our results and those collected in the literature is the asymmetry in the energy barrier of the process, being much more energetic in the sense of obtaining the A*‐T* tautomer than in the inverse case. In our case, the reverse process barrier is negligible (Δ Es < 1 kcal/mol) and the equilibrium constant is very small ( K eq ≈ 10 −10 ), which makes the few molecules of the rare tautomer easily revert to their canonical form and do not participate in the process of genetic mutation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, barrier and reaction energies are similar to values of Gorb et al and Noguera et al for the concerted mechanism, and those of Xiao et al for the sptewise mechanism, shown in Table . In summary, our quantum values of reaction and activation energies are within the ranges that derive from published by other authors, specifically, from 10 to 14 kcal/mol for the reaction energy and of 12–23 kcal/mol for the energy barrier. Another concordance between our results and those collected in the literature is the asymmetry in the energy barrier of the process, being much more energetic in the sense of obtaining the A*‐T* tautomer than in the inverse case. In our case, the reverse process barrier is negligible (Δ Es < 1 kcal/mol) and the equilibrium constant is very small ( K eq ≈ 10 −10 ), which makes the few molecules of the rare tautomer easily revert to their canonical form and do not participate in the process of genetic mutation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There have been a large number of theoretical studies on this tautomerization process and its different mechanisms . Most of these studies addressed tautomerization in the gas phase using ab initio methods, although some authors employed a continuum model to describe the solvent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Consequently, proton transfer mechanism in DNA base pairs have been extensively studied using a wide range theoretical methods. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] However, most of this studies were carried out in gas phase, though DNA properties are highly sensitive to the environment. Physiological conditions are obviously closer to the condensed phase than to the gas phase, and consequently studying (partially) hydrated DNA bases has become a very important task for computational chemists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Enzyme catalysis of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase may be understood by a model of vibrationally enhanced proton transfer tunneling [10]. Furthermore, the double proton transfer reaction in DNA base pairs has been studied in detail and even been hypothesized as a possible source of spontaneous mutation [11][12][13].…”
Section: Quantum Tunneling Versus Classical Over Barrier Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%