2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-009-9233-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular docking study on anticancer activity of plant-derived natural products

Abstract: A variety of compounds from plant sources have been reported to possess substantial anticancer properties; however, their modes of action have not been clearly defined. Selected plant-derived compounds that exhibit anticancer activity were subjected to docking simulations using AutoDock 3.0.5. To preliminarily investigate the potential molecular targets and to confirm the experimental activity testing for these anticancer compounds, the docking was performed using different enzymes and receptor proteins involv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with topoisomerase II, its binding energy (-1.09 kcal/mol) and inhibition constant (7.40 nM) values were comparable to those of the cocrystal ligand. DNA topoisomerases I and II have both been implicated in cell survival and they play critical roles in DNA metabolism and structure (Phosrithong and Ungwitayatorn, 2010). Proceraside A showed the best interaction with topoisomerases I, which involved six hydrogen bonds formed via the following: the backbone N atom of Glu356, the backbone O atom of Tyr426; the backbone N atom of Met428; the side chain N atoms of Asn722 and Lys751 and the hydrophobic interactions via Ala351, Asn352, Trp416, Ile427, Leu429, Pro431, Lys436, and Leu721.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with topoisomerase II, its binding energy (-1.09 kcal/mol) and inhibition constant (7.40 nM) values were comparable to those of the cocrystal ligand. DNA topoisomerases I and II have both been implicated in cell survival and they play critical roles in DNA metabolism and structure (Phosrithong and Ungwitayatorn, 2010). Proceraside A showed the best interaction with topoisomerases I, which involved six hydrogen bonds formed via the following: the backbone N atom of Glu356, the backbone O atom of Tyr426; the backbone N atom of Met428; the side chain N atoms of Asn722 and Lys751 and the hydrophobic interactions via Ala351, Asn352, Trp416, Ile427, Leu429, Pro431, Lys436, and Leu721.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both DNA Topoisomerases I and II have implicated functions in cell survival and play critical roles in DNA metabolism and structure (Phosrithong and Ungwitayatorn, 2010). Glycopentalone showed fine interaction with Topoisomerase I, which involved five hydrogen bonds of distances 3.30, 2.97, 2.40, 2.98, and 3.05Å formed via backbone N atom and O atom of Asn352, backbone O atom of Tyr426, backbone N atom of Met428 and side chain NZ atom of Lys436 respectively, and hydrophobic interactions via Ala351, Ala356 and Ile.…”
Section: Compounds Drug Targets (Pdb Entries)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of these molecules are now subjected to computational analysis through molecular docking like use of AUTODOCK in order to investigate their anticancer and other properties with accuracy at molecular level. This also helps to identify the nature of formed complexes with receptor proteins present in cell cycle and other biological processes (Phosrithong, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%