2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular docking prediction and in vitro studies elucidate anti-cancer activity of phytoestrogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where ΔH is the enthalpy variation, T is the absolute temperature, ΔS is the entropy variation and R is the universal gas constant [58]. Therefore, in order to study how the ligand will bond on the target molecule, it is important to define which molecule will be the ligand and the target [59].The AutoDock Vina Code [60] was used to simulate molecular docking between amentoflavone and Cruzain (therapeutic target, enzyme involved in the evolutionary cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi).…”
Section: Docking Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where ΔH is the enthalpy variation, T is the absolute temperature, ΔS is the entropy variation and R is the universal gas constant [58]. Therefore, in order to study how the ligand will bond on the target molecule, it is important to define which molecule will be the ligand and the target [59].The AutoDock Vina Code [60] was used to simulate molecular docking between amentoflavone and Cruzain (therapeutic target, enzyme involved in the evolutionary cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi).…”
Section: Docking Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the molecular docking, a computational strategy that allows one to predict binding site complementarity between a drug and its therapeutic target, has been massively used to assist drug repositioning for several diseases [6] , [9] . For example, in silico simulations were used to evaluate non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV treatment [10] , as well as currently used drugs against HIV-1 protease of subtype D [11] ; to study the substrate recognition processes for influenza drug targets [12] , [13] ; to investigate and screening inhibitors against Ebola virus [14] , [15] , [16] ; to explore potential binding pockets and inhibitors for Zika [17] , [18] , Chikungunya [19] and Dengue virus [20] , [21] ; to perform structure-based virtual screening studies of potential drug target of Leishmania donovani [22] ; to evaluate the anticancer activity of chloro and bromo-pyrazole curcumin knoevenagel condensates and phytoestrogens [23] , [24] ; to investigate the efficacy of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) to the treatment of different Hepatitis C virus [25] and to design modified peptidomimetic cellulose derivatives Hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors [26] . In addition, in silico simulationshave have also been used to evaluate potential inhibitors of the interaction between ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 region binding domain [27] , to help in the drug repositioning of anti-Hepatitis C virus drugs [28] and anti-polymerase drugs [29] against SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those structures are useful to understand the structural changes due to agonist and antagonist binding in the ERα LBP. Various computational techniques such as molecular docking [18][19][20][21][22][23][24], MD simulations [25][26][27][28][29][30], predictive modeling [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], and in vitro studies were conducted to predict ER binders or non-binders [42,43] and agonists or antagonists [44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%