2016
DOI: 10.1515/pjvs-2016-0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular diversity of Clostridium botulinum and phenotypically similar strains

Abstract: This study was undertaken to examine phenotypic and genetic features of strains preliminary classified as Clostridium botulinum species. The phenotypic characteristics were assessed with different culture media and biochemical tests. The genetic characterization included detection of botulinum toxin genes by PCR and macrorestriction analysis with SmaI, XhoI and SacII by PFGE (Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis). Despite similar biochemical properties of all analysed strains, only 47% of them contained genes dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The real-time PCR screening method was used for C. botulinum detection, based on ntnh gene detection according to Raphael et al ( 22 ) with modifications by Grenda et al ( 8 ). Real-time PCR results were verified using multiplex PCR method for detection of specific BoNT genes determining production of A, B, E, and F toxins according to De Medici et al ( 5 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The real-time PCR screening method was used for C. botulinum detection, based on ntnh gene detection according to Raphael et al ( 22 ) with modifications by Grenda et al ( 8 ). Real-time PCR results were verified using multiplex PCR method for detection of specific BoNT genes determining production of A, B, E, and F toxins according to De Medici et al ( 5 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time PCR results were verified using multiplex PCR method for detection of specific BoNT genes determining production of A, B, E, and F toxins according to De Medici et al ( 5 ). All PCR methods used in this study were previously validated on artificially contaminated food and feed matrices ( 8 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%