1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19961218)66:3<281::aid-ajmg9>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection of new mutations, resolution of ambiguous results and complex genetic counseling issues in Huntington disease

Abstract: Huntington disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by expansion of a variable length (CAG)n repeat in the 5' coding region of a novel gene on chromosome 4p16.3. We provide comprehensive molecular analysis of a sporadic case of HD in which a paternally derived normal length allele expanded to an affected length allele. Linkage analysis and paternity testing confirm the paternal origin of the expansion and demonstrate that unequal crossing over during meiosis is an unlikely mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1989] Discusses requests for predictive testing of affected individuals, minors, impact on relatives, use of research samples for clinical purposes Demyttenaere et al [1992] Discusses challenging counseling situations Harper and Newcombe [1992] Use of life table risk estimates in counseling; anticipates the report of Brinkman et al [1997] Heimler andZanko [1995], Reich et al [1996] Case report of testing monozygotic twins Mehlman et al [1996], Burgess et al [1997], Uhlmann et al [1996], Visintainer et al [2001] Anonymous testing Alford et al [1996] Challenging laboratory and clinical scenarios Almqvist et al [1997] Discusses the impact of the unusual situation of a reversal of risk between a linkage analysis and direct gene analysis Maat-Kievit et al [1999b], Benjamin and Lashwood [2000], Lindblad [2001] Testing individuals at 25% risk Alonso et al [2002], Squitieri et al [2003] Counseling about unexpected homozygosity for an expanded allele; predictive testing for patients at risk for homozygosity Nahhas et al [2009] Contraction of an abnormal allele into the reduced penetrance range Hendricks et al [2009] Estimating the probability of de novo HD in the children of male carriers of high-normal alleles Sequeiros et al [2010], Semaka et al [2013c] Frequency of intermediate and reduced penetrance alleles Chen et al [2012] Use of a novel model for estimating genetic risk incorporating family information Palomaki and Richards [2012] Laboratory proficiency testing Semaka et al [2013a] Patient comprehension of the implications of an intermediate allele Squitieri and Jankovic [2012], Ha et al [2012] Possibility of a phenotype associated with CAG repeat lengths of 27-35 Semaka et al [2013bSemaka et al [ , 2015, Semaka and Hayden (2014) CAG size-specific risk estimates for intermediate allele repeat instability; counseling implications; case report of expansion of a maternal intermediate allele Bean and Bayrak-Toydemir [20...…”
Section: Where Is This All Going? Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1989] Discusses requests for predictive testing of affected individuals, minors, impact on relatives, use of research samples for clinical purposes Demyttenaere et al [1992] Discusses challenging counseling situations Harper and Newcombe [1992] Use of life table risk estimates in counseling; anticipates the report of Brinkman et al [1997] Heimler andZanko [1995], Reich et al [1996] Case report of testing monozygotic twins Mehlman et al [1996], Burgess et al [1997], Uhlmann et al [1996], Visintainer et al [2001] Anonymous testing Alford et al [1996] Challenging laboratory and clinical scenarios Almqvist et al [1997] Discusses the impact of the unusual situation of a reversal of risk between a linkage analysis and direct gene analysis Maat-Kievit et al [1999b], Benjamin and Lashwood [2000], Lindblad [2001] Testing individuals at 25% risk Alonso et al [2002], Squitieri et al [2003] Counseling about unexpected homozygosity for an expanded allele; predictive testing for patients at risk for homozygosity Nahhas et al [2009] Contraction of an abnormal allele into the reduced penetrance range Hendricks et al [2009] Estimating the probability of de novo HD in the children of male carriers of high-normal alleles Sequeiros et al [2010], Semaka et al [2013c] Frequency of intermediate and reduced penetrance alleles Chen et al [2012] Use of a novel model for estimating genetic risk incorporating family information Palomaki and Richards [2012] Laboratory proficiency testing Semaka et al [2013a] Patient comprehension of the implications of an intermediate allele Squitieri and Jankovic [2012], Ha et al [2012] Possibility of a phenotype associated with CAG repeat lengths of 27-35 Semaka et al [2013bSemaka et al [ , 2015, Semaka and Hayden (2014) CAG size-specific risk estimates for intermediate allele repeat instability; counseling implications; case report of expansion of a maternal intermediate allele Bean and Bayrak-Toydemir [20...…”
Section: Where Is This All Going? Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of somatic mosaicism in the other CAG repeat diseases have shown that this initial association was purely coincidental. For DWLA, SCAl and SC.43, the longest repeat expansions are observed in the cerebrum, and the smallest expansions occur in the cerebellum (5,19,49,84,124,131). These profiles are idenl.ica1 to those seen in CNS tissues in HD, although different populations of neurons degenerate in all four of these diseases.…”
Section: Somatic Mosaicismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such alleles do not cause HD but show instability on replication and tend to expand in successive generation with greater instability in spermatogenesis than in oogenesis (Zuhlke et al, 1993; Ranen et al, 1995). This instability of increased number of CAG repeats over successive generations explains the phenomenon of genetic anticipation, which is defined by the tendency of an earlier disease onset in successive generations (Goldberg et al, 1993; Myers et al, 1993; Alford et al, 1996). The age of onset cannot be predicted from the CAG repeat length in clinical practice.…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%