2005
DOI: 10.1080/13693780500129418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection ofParacoccidioides brasiliensisin soil

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to evaluate different techniques for the detection of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in soil, e.g., culture, animal inoculation and specific DNA amplification by Nested PCR. We designed species-specific inner primers derived from rDNA regions (ITS, 5.8S gene) and found their sensitivity to be higher than culture and animal inoculation. In addition, the sensitivity of these primers was higher than p27-gene primers developed for detection of P. brasiliensis in soil in a prev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit of detection for the OTsn-PCR assay was comparable with that of the protocol developed by Koishi et al 5 ( Figure 1B) and was more sensitive than the protocols in the Imai et al 8 and Theodoro et al 9 studies (Figures 1C-1D). Furthermore, when using DNA extracted from the clinical samples, the OTsn-PCR assay and the protocol developed by Koishi et al 5 were able to detect P. brasiliensis DNA in all of the samples (100%) ( Table 1), while the protocols of Imai et al 8 and Theodoro et al 9 only detected P. brasiliensis DNA in four (28.5%) and eight (57.2%) of the clinical samples, respectively (Table 1). A possible cause for this difference may be the lower numbers of cycles used in these reactions.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The limit of detection for the OTsn-PCR assay was comparable with that of the protocol developed by Koishi et al 5 ( Figure 1B) and was more sensitive than the protocols in the Imai et al 8 and Theodoro et al 9 studies (Figures 1C-1D). Furthermore, when using DNA extracted from the clinical samples, the OTsn-PCR assay and the protocol developed by Koishi et al 5 were able to detect P. brasiliensis DNA in all of the samples (100%) ( Table 1), while the protocols of Imai et al 8 and Theodoro et al 9 only detected P. brasiliensis DNA in four (28.5%) and eight (57.2%) of the clinical samples, respectively (Table 1). A possible cause for this difference may be the lower numbers of cycles used in these reactions.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…This OTsn-PCR approach was compared with the nested and semi-nested PCR methods described by Imai et al 8 , Theodoro et al 9 and Koishi et al 5 Similar to our OTsn-PCR assay, these reactions use sequences of ribosomal DNA as targets, especially from the ITS, and are specifi c for the detection of P. brasiliensis. For the sake of comparison, we used fi ve different serially diluted P. brasiliensis DNA concentrations (2.5ng, 250pg, 25pg, 2.5pg and 0.25pg).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of P. brasiliensis in soil samples collected from armadillo burrows could be confirmed molecularly, by applying a species-specific Nested PCR, based on ITS-5.8S-ITS2 regions [69]. It is interesting to note that the pathogen could be detected mainly in soil samples collected in the interior of the armadillo burrows [70].…”
Section: Origin and Maintenance Of P Brasiliensis' Virulencementioning
confidence: 93%