2016
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Detection of Legionella spp. and their associations with Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and amoeba hosts in a drinking water distribution system

Abstract: The results provide insight into microbial pathogen detection that may aid in the monitoring of microbial water quality within DWDS prior to customer exposures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Mycobacterium spp. gene copies measured by quantitative PCR has also been reported in a drinking water distribution system (Lu et al , 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…and Mycobacterium spp. gene copies measured by quantitative PCR has also been reported in a drinking water distribution system (Lu et al , 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…were present in half of the samples. The detection of a large number of eukaryotes inside drinking water systems has been reported previously (Valster et al ., ; Buse et al ., ; Lu et al ., ). These eukaryotes could enter distribution systems through physical breakthroughs in treatment processes, attaching on media particles released from filters, and contamination from surrounding environments during pipe breakage (Proctor and Hammes, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drinking water fountains were most commonly positive, and taps that were repeatedly positive were more frequently fed chlorinated water (16%) compared with chloraminated water (8.6%). Lu et al () examined large‐volume (90 L) ultrafiltration concentrates from six sites within a distribution system and frequently (57%) detected Legionella spp. by qPCR at an average concentration of 85 cell equivalents per liter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%