1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1994.tb00052.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection of Bacteroides forsythus in human periodontitis

Abstract: The usefulness of a digoxigenin-labeled genomic DNA probe for the detection of subgingival Bacteroides forsythus was examined. In addition, the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) was used to delineate the genetic diversity of B. forsythus periodontal isolates. The DNA probe detected 10(3) B. forsythus cells and yielded a strong signal at 10(4) cells. It reacted with B. forsythus ATCC 43037T and 44 clinical isolates and showed no detectable reactivity with 75 strains of 24 other oral microbia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(52 reference statements)
7
35
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 14 whole-genome DNA probes were validated by hybridization with 249 strains representing 51 species (90), while commercially available oligonucleotide probes were validated against panels containing fewer species (195,253,255,282). A whole-genome probe to B. forsythus showed no detectable reactivity with 75 strains representing 14 oral species (172). This limited evaluation means that some crossreactions with untested plaque species probably exist, and could contribute to the large number of false-positive results found when DNA probes are compared to culture results obtained on the same plaque samples (15,135,142,158,172,191,195,196,221,235,251,255,296,297,315,345; K. Backman, Letter, J. Periodontol.…”
Section: Dna Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, 14 whole-genome DNA probes were validated by hybridization with 249 strains representing 51 species (90), while commercially available oligonucleotide probes were validated against panels containing fewer species (195,253,255,282). A whole-genome probe to B. forsythus showed no detectable reactivity with 75 strains representing 14 oral species (172). This limited evaluation means that some crossreactions with untested plaque species probably exist, and could contribute to the large number of false-positive results found when DNA probes are compared to culture results obtained on the same plaque samples (15,135,142,158,172,191,195,196,221,235,251,255,296,297,315,345; K. Backman, Letter, J. Periodontol.…”
Section: Dna Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity ranged from 0.17 for A. actinomycetemcomitans to 0.86 for B. forsythus and Streptococcus sanguis, and the specificity ranged from 0.17 for P. intermedia to 1.0 for C. rectus. These ranges indicate the typical finding with DNA probes, namely, that they do not correlate well with culture or serological data, usually being positive when the culture or serological findings are negative, i.e., many false positives (142,158,172,179,191,195,221,255,345). The panel of 18 probes developed by Papapanou showed that only B. forsythus, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and C. rectus (Wolinella recta) were associated with periodontal disease in 148 Chinese subjects who had never received any periodontal treatment (220).…”
Section: Specific Plaque Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This organism is often isolated from active periodontitis sites (5), and it is also reported that the presence of B. forsythus is a risk factor for periodontal disease (7,8,29). B. forsythus is frequently isolated with Porphyromonas gingivalis, which is one of the important periodontopathic bacteria (4,16), and these two bacteria are known to have a synergistic effect in animal models (27,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods, including random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), arbitrary primed PCR (AR-PCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing, have recently been used for the authentication of biological materials (Lotufo et al 1994;Lakra et al 2007;Taylor and Ford, 2007). Although they have been proven to be efficient in taxonomic identification and in distinguishing genuine crude drugs from their substitutes or adulterants in previous reports, the application of these methods is limited by the high cost of the fine quality template DNA that is required in these experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%