2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x17000888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular data reveal high diversity ofUvulifer(Trematoda: Diplostomidae) in Middle America, with the description of a new species

Abstract: Members of the genus Uvulifer are distributed worldwide and infect aquatic snails and freshwater fishes as first and second intermediate hosts, respectively, and fish-eating birds (kingfishers) as definitive hosts. Metacercariae of Uvulifer spp. were collected from the fins and skin of 20 species of freshwater fishes in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, and the adults were recovered from the intestine of kingfishers in four localities of Mexico. The genetic divergence among 76 samples (64 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(56 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3 herein are consistent with an analysis of concatenated CO1 and rDNA spacer sequences by Blasco-Costa and Locke (2017). The association of Hysteromorpha, Alaria, Tylodelphys and Diplostomum is consistent with trees in Fraija-Fernández et al (2015), López-Jiménez et al (2017), and Olson et al (2003). Discrepancies (e.g., Hysteromorpha in Hernández-Mena et al, 2017) are typically associated with poor nodal support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 and 3 herein are consistent with an analysis of concatenated CO1 and rDNA spacer sequences by Blasco-Costa and Locke (2017). The association of Hysteromorpha, Alaria, Tylodelphys and Diplostomum is consistent with trees in Fraija-Fernández et al (2015), López-Jiménez et al (2017), and Olson et al (2003). Discrepancies (e.g., Hysteromorpha in Hernández-Mena et al, 2017) are typically associated with poor nodal support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Posthodiplostomum , though nominally part of the family, is separate from and basal to a clade composed of other diplostomids and the Strigeidae. Posthodiplostomum belongs to the Crassiphialinae Sudarikov, 1960 and is consistently recovered with other members of this subfamily (e.g., Uvulifer, Bolbophorus, Ornithodiplostomum, Mesoophorodiplostomum and Posthodiplostomum in Athokpam and Tandon, 2014; Blasco-Costa and Locke, 2017; Hernández-Mena et al, 2017; López-Jiménez et al, 2017; Sereno-Uribe et al, 2018; Locke et al, 2010, see fig. S4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We hypothesize that the genus Sphincterodiplostomum contains additional not-yet-described species as has been recently demonstrated for several other diplostomoidean genera, such as Crassiphiala Van Haitsma, 1925, Hysteromorpha Lutz, 1931 and Uvulifer Yamaguti, 1934 (e.g. Locke et al ., 2018; López-Jiménez et al ., 2018; Achatz et al ., 2019a, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the genetic divergence among isolates of Tylodelphys sp., T. mashonense, T. excavata, T. aztecae and T. scheuringi ranged from 0 to 1.4% (Chibwana et al ., 2013, 2015; Otachi et al ., 2015; García-Varela et al ., 2016; Blasco-Costa et al ., 2017), and among isolates of Diplostomum mergi, D. pseudospathaceum and D. baeri from 0 to 1.01% (Georgieva et al ., 2013; Selback et al ., 2015). Finally, genetic divergence among isolates of Uvulifer spinatus ranged from 0 to 1.8% (López-Jimenez et al ., 2017). With respect to ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2, the genetic divergence estimated among the 19 isolates (5 metacercariae, 10 adults from the Neotropical region plus 4 isolates from the Nearctic region) of H .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Blasco-Costa et al ., 2017) and from 0 to 0.4% among isolates of D. baeri (see Blasco-Costa et al ., 2014). Finally, among isolates of Uvulifer spinatus genetic divergence ranged from 0 to 1.4% (López-Jimenez et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%