Molecular data place Trypetheliaceae in Dothideomycetes

Del-Prado, Ruth; Schmitt, Imke; Kautz, Stefanie; Palice, Zdeněk; Lücking, Robert; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten

doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2005.08.013

Cited by 56 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A single unidentified Trypethelium species was included, but numerous lichenized ascostromatic bitunicate species (such as those in the Pyrenulales) remain candidates for placement in the Dothideomycetes. In fact a study by Del Prado et al (2006) shows good support for a placement of the lichenized Trypetheliaceae within the Dothideomycetes. In addition, numerous lineages remain unresolved in this class.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci

Schoch

Shoemaker²,

Seifert³

et al. 2006

Mycologia

250

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present an expanded multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes. The final data matrix consisted of four loci (nuc SSU rDNA, nuc LSU rDNA, TEF1, RPB2) for 96 taxa, representing five of the seven orders in the current classification of Dothideomycetes and several outgroup taxa representative of the major clades in the Pezizomycotina. The resulting phylogeny differentiated two main dothideomycete lineages comprising the pseudoparaphysate Pleosporales and aparaphysate Dothideales. We propose the subclasses Pleosporomycetidae (order Pleosporales) and Dothideomycetidae (orders Dothideales, Capnodiales and Myriangiales). Furthermore we provide strong molecular support for the placement of Mycosphaerellaceae and Piedraiaceae within the Capnodiales and introduce Davidiellaceae as a new family to accommodate species of Davidiella with Cladosporium anamorphs. Some taxa could not be placed with certainty (e.g. Hysteriales), but there was strong support for new groupings. The clade containing members of the genera Botryosphaeria and Guignardia resolved well but without support for any relationship to any other described orders and we hereby propose the new order Botryosphaeriales. These data also are consistent with the removal of Chaetothyriales and Coryneliales from the Dothideomycetes and strongly support their placement in the Eurotiomycetes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci

Schoch

Shoemaker²,

Seifert³

et al. 2006

Mycologia

250

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1) SSU, LSU, rpb1, rpb2, tef fig. 1) SSU 13 BPP ¼ 0.99 Del Prado et al (2006, fig. 1) LSU, mt-SSU 15 BPP ¼ 1 Lumbsch et al (2005, fig.…”

Section: Typus: Zoopage Drechsler 1935mentioning

confidence: 99%

A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi

Hibbett¹,

Binder²,

Bischoff³

et al. 2007

Mycological Research

Self Cite

1,948

1,178

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most dramatic shifts in the classification relative to previous works concern the groups that have traditionally been included in the Chytridiomycota and Zygomycota. The Chytridiomycota is retained in a restricted sense, with Blastocladiomycota and Neocallimastigomycota representing segregate phyla of flagellated Fungi. Taxa traditionally placed in Zygomycota are distributed among Glomeromycota and several subphyla incertae sedis, including Mucoromycotina, Entomophthoromycotina, Kickxellomycotina, and Zoopagomycotina. Microsporidia are included in the Fungi, but no further subdivision of the group is proposed. Several genera of 'basal' Fungi of uncertain position are not placed in any higher taxa, including Basidiobolus, Caulochytrium, Olpidium, and Rozella.

show abstract

“…The main differences are the colour of the mature ascospores (usually hyaline in the Trypetheliaceae, grey to brown in the Pyrenulaceae) and the branching of the hamathecium filaments (anastomosing in the Trypetheliaceae, mostly unbranched in the Pyrenulaceae); both are microscopical characters that sometimes have been misjudged due to inadequate material or observations. Despite their similarities they are phylogenetically well separated: molecular analysis (Del Prado et al 2006) confirms the Trypetheliaceae as monophyletic and places the family in Dothideomycetes. The Pyrenulaceae, which were previously classified with the Trypetheliaceae in the Pyrenulales or Melanommatales, are supported in the same molecular analysis as monophyletic and belonging to the Chaetothyriomycetes.…”

Section: Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

Diversity and endemism in the pyrenocarpous lichen families Pyrenulaceae and Trypetheliaceae in the Malesian flora region

Aptroot¹

2009

blum - j plant tax and plant geog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Molecular data place Trypetheliaceae in Dothideomycetes

Cited by 56 publications

References 32 publications

A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci

A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci

A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi

Diversity and endemism in the pyrenocarpous lichen families Pyrenulaceae and Trypetheliaceae in the Malesian flora region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About