2006
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of de novo dup(5)(q35.2q35.3) and review of the literature of pure partial trisomy 5q

Abstract: An 11-year-old girl presented with the phenotype of microcephaly, moderate mental retardation, motor retardation, short stature, strabismus, brachydactyly, and facial dysmorphism. She had undergone surgery for inguinal hernias. Detailed examinations of the heart and other internal organs revealed normal findings. Her karyotype was 46,XX,dup(5)(q35.2q35.3) de novo. Molecular cytogenetic analysis showed a paternally derived 5q35.2 --> q35.3 direct duplication and led to a correlation between the particular genot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20 A patient with a smaller (520-650 kb) duplication within the Sotos syndrome critical region, also encompassing the NSD1 gene but not reciprocal to the common deletion (Figure 1e, top), had microcephaly and short stature in addition to mild facial dysmorphism. 21 This suggests that the gene dosage effect that seems to be responsible for this phenotype is limited to a region smaller than the 1.1 Mb minimum-duplicated fragment found in our patients, and that it is likely to involve the NSD1 gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 A patient with a smaller (520-650 kb) duplication within the Sotos syndrome critical region, also encompassing the NSD1 gene but not reciprocal to the common deletion (Figure 1e, top), had microcephaly and short stature in addition to mild facial dysmorphism. 21 This suggests that the gene dosage effect that seems to be responsible for this phenotype is limited to a region smaller than the 1.1 Mb minimum-duplicated fragment found in our patients, and that it is likely to involve the NSD1 gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large duplication including this and adjacent regions, detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), 20 and a small duplication contained within the region, detected by multiplex ligationdependent probe amplification (MLPA), 21 have been reported. However, the duplication reciprocal to the common deletion of the Sotos critical region predicted by nonallelic homologous recombination at the flanking LCRs has not been described to date, and its phenotypic consequences in humans are not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alteration in NSD1 dosage is responsible for Sotos syndrome, which has an inverted phenotype (Chen et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2011). However, it is inappropriate to term the phenotype arising from the 5q35 microduplication as a "reversed SS" as there are other chromosomal imbalances that manifest as short stature and microcephaly, but lack the "reversed facial features" that are observed in patients harboring the duplicated 5q35.2q35.3 chromosomal region (Dikow et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,16 De acuerdo con nuestra revisión las características más frecuentes son: talla baja postnatal, retraso psicomotor, microcefalia, cara alargada, fisuras palpebrales cortas, nariz larga, filtrum plano, labio superior delgado, defectos en pabellones auriculares y craneosinostosis. [17][18][19][20][21] En la Figura 5 se muestra esquemáticamente los diferentes tamaños de duplicaciones de los casos previamente descritos y se hace una comparación con nuestra paciente. La duplicación de nuestra paciente es una de las más grandes informadas en la literatura (14Mb), siendo sólo superada por el reporte de Kariminejad et al 16 de 15Mb.…”
unclassified