2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01868-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular correlates of clinical response and resistance to atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
151
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
151
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of tissue‐based biomarkers exhibited that tissue‐based tumour mutation burden (tTMB) (optimal cutoff = 52, Supplementary Figure S1A–D ) and tumour neoantigen burden (TNB) (optimal cutoff = 26, Supplementary Table S5 , Supplementary Figure S2A–D ) were not apparent association with response rate or survival benefit in the camrelizumab + apatinib, in which patients with high tTMB showed a non‐significant trend of longer PFS ( p = .063) compared with those with low. This was consistent with previous study, 5 suggesting that there may be no relationship between CD8 + T cell levels and neoantigen load in HCC. 6 Besides, PD‐L1 status was not significantly associated with survival or clinical efficacy in 54 HCC tissues (Supplementary Figure S3A–C ).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Analyses of tissue‐based biomarkers exhibited that tissue‐based tumour mutation burden (tTMB) (optimal cutoff = 52, Supplementary Figure S1A–D ) and tumour neoantigen burden (TNB) (optimal cutoff = 26, Supplementary Table S5 , Supplementary Figure S2A–D ) were not apparent association with response rate or survival benefit in the camrelizumab + apatinib, in which patients with high tTMB showed a non‐significant trend of longer PFS ( p = .063) compared with those with low. This was consistent with previous study, 5 suggesting that there may be no relationship between CD8 + T cell levels and neoantigen load in HCC. 6 Besides, PD‐L1 status was not significantly associated with survival or clinical efficacy in 54 HCC tissues (Supplementary Figure S3A–C ).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The phase 1b study of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab also found PD-L1 expression on tumor and tumorinfiltrating immune cells to poorly predict progression-free survival [5] . Furthermore, exploratory analyses conducted using archival specimens from this and another early phase trial of atezolizumab plus bevaciumab did not associate tumor mutation burden (TMB) with treatment response or progression-free survival, although high expression of VEGF receptor 2, a T-regulatory signature, and a myeloid inflammation signature were associated with benefit from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with atezolizumab alone [6] . In a more recent extensive biomarker analysis for the IMbrave150 trial, high expression of CD274 and intra-tumor CD8(+) cells density was associated with prolonged patient survival, while high Treg:Teff ratio and expression of HCC tumor markers, such as GPC3 and AFP, were associated with poor outcome [7] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…More recently, an integrated molecular analysis was performed, comprising RNA sequencing, DNA sequencing and simple and multiplex immunohistochemistry of 358 patients included in the phase Ib GO30140 ( 144 ) and the phase III IMbrave150 trial ( 114 , 116 ). This showed that pre-existing immunity, including the expression of a T effector transcriptomic signature and CD8+ T cell infiltration, predicted response to the combination of atezolizumab-bevacizumab, but not to sorafenib ( 145 ). Importantly, improved outcomes for the combination vs atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with high VEGFR-2 expression.…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, improved outcomes for the combination vs atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with high VEGFR-2 expression. Conversely, reduced benefit from the combination was associated with a low Treg/effector T cell ratio ( 145 ). These data highlight the synergistic effects of the combination of atezolizumab-bevacizumab and suggest several predictive biomarkers that will need validation in future trials.…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%