1985
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(85)90417-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular cloning and characterization of F9 fimbriae from a uropathogenic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the F8 fimbrial subunit was found to be nearly 20 kd, which is in good agreement with the Mr value of 19.7 kd published by Moser et al (submitted for publication) and is within the range of 15-29 kd that has been described for other fimbriae [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. No differences in size could be seen between F8 fimbriae isolated from the wild-type isolate and from the K-12 clones harboring the cloned F8 DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The size of the F8 fimbrial subunit was found to be nearly 20 kd, which is in good agreement with the Mr value of 19.7 kd published by Moser et al (submitted for publication) and is within the range of 15-29 kd that has been described for other fimbriae [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. No differences in size could be seen between F8 fimbriae isolated from the wild-type isolate and from the K-12 clones harboring the cloned F8 DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5.0 and 8.5 kb [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]23]. Therefore, it is suggested that the region coding for F8 fimbriae is smaller than the 12-kb segment inserted into pBR322.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations