2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-017-1180-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of Vietnamese cocoa genotypes (Theobroma cacao L.) using microsatellite markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 143 samples had few matching duplicates (nine groups with two members each) and these were usually within a province rather than across provinces. This internal duplicate matching was lower than that recorded for cacao collected in Belize (Motilal et al, 2010) and for farm selections in Dominica (Gopaulchan et al, 2019), Dominican Republic (Boza et al, 2013), Hawaii (Nagai et al, 2009), Nicaragua (Trognitz et al, 2011, the Huallaga and Ucayali valleys in Peru (Zhang et al, 2006a), Puerto Rico (Cosme et al, 2016) but higher than that reported in one farm in Jamaica (Lindo et al, 2018), Vietnam (Everaert et al, 2017) or for the ICS and TRD accessions in Trinidad (Johnson et al, 2009). Furthermore, an absence of duplicates was reported for 164 trees in Bolivia (Zhang et al, 2012), 93 trees in Tumaco, Colombia (Yacenia Morillo et al, 2014), for 53 trees in Sulawesi, Indonesia (Dinarti et al, 2015), for 220 trees in the Juanjui province of the Huallaga valley, Peru (Zhang et al, 2011), and for 109 trees in Uganda (Gopaulchan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The 143 samples had few matching duplicates (nine groups with two members each) and these were usually within a province rather than across provinces. This internal duplicate matching was lower than that recorded for cacao collected in Belize (Motilal et al, 2010) and for farm selections in Dominica (Gopaulchan et al, 2019), Dominican Republic (Boza et al, 2013), Hawaii (Nagai et al, 2009), Nicaragua (Trognitz et al, 2011, the Huallaga and Ucayali valleys in Peru (Zhang et al, 2006a), Puerto Rico (Cosme et al, 2016) but higher than that reported in one farm in Jamaica (Lindo et al, 2018), Vietnam (Everaert et al, 2017) or for the ICS and TRD accessions in Trinidad (Johnson et al, 2009). Furthermore, an absence of duplicates was reported for 164 trees in Bolivia (Zhang et al, 2012), 93 trees in Tumaco, Colombia (Yacenia Morillo et al, 2014), for 53 trees in Sulawesi, Indonesia (Dinarti et al, 2015), for 220 trees in the Juanjui province of the Huallaga valley, Peru (Zhang et al, 2011), and for 109 trees in Uganda (Gopaulchan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Ten internationals standard SSR primers (Table 2) commonly used for DNA sequencing of cocoa genotype [18] were chosen for this study. These SSR primers were purchased from the Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, Iowa).…”
Section: Ssr Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For genetic analysis, one young and healthy leaf from each somatic embryogenesis culture and grafted donor trees were collected from the MCB Research Station for the analysis of somaclonal variation. DNA was extracted from each treatment using a slightly modified CTAB-SDS method from Everaert et al [16] and Johnsiul and Awang [17]. Freshly extracted DNA (5 μl) was then electrophoresed on 1% Agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualised under ultraviolet transilluminator for the quality and yield assessments.…”
Section: Field Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these, mTcCIR7, mTcCIR40 and mTcCIR22 primers were labeled with 6-FAM (blue dye) whereas mTcCIR18 and mTcCIR33 primers were labeled with HEX (green dye) (Table 1). The thermal cycling protocol for the amplification was based on a modified method described by Everaert et al [16]. All the PCR amplification was carried out in a GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Inc.).…”
Section: Field Performancementioning
confidence: 99%