2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of toxicity mechanism of single-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The chronic toxicity (e.g. retarded growth) of amide-modified singlewalled carbon nanotubes (a-SWCNTs) for C. elegans is also reported by Chou et al Combined with their results of functional genomic study and endocytosis marker labeling study, they have concluded that the endocytosis of intestinal cells of a-SWCNTs treated worms is inhibited, which may have been an important mechanism in aSWCNTs toxicity [46]. Therefore, comparing with other animal models, C. elegans have the capability of providing the real-time toxicity information of nanomaterials at molecular level, subcellular level and whole-organism level simultaneously, and then helping researchers to draw more relevant conclusions for the biosafety of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The chronic toxicity (e.g. retarded growth) of amide-modified singlewalled carbon nanotubes (a-SWCNTs) for C. elegans is also reported by Chou et al Combined with their results of functional genomic study and endocytosis marker labeling study, they have concluded that the endocytosis of intestinal cells of a-SWCNTs treated worms is inhibited, which may have been an important mechanism in aSWCNTs toxicity [46]. Therefore, comparing with other animal models, C. elegans have the capability of providing the real-time toxicity information of nanomaterials at molecular level, subcellular level and whole-organism level simultaneously, and then helping researchers to draw more relevant conclusions for the biosafety of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Given that ROS production indicates the toxicity of nanobiomaterials, eg, GO, 28 CNTs, 26 TiO 2 , and ZnO, 36,40 our data here suggest that ROS overproduction in the intestine tissue might be one of the mechanisms underlying adverse BNNS and BN-800-2 effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[19][20][21] These NMs include metal nanoparticles (NPs; TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , and ZnO 2 ) [22][23][24] and carbon NPs (carbon NTs [CNTs], graphene oxide [GO], and graphite nanoplatelets). [25][26][27][28] Here, we analyze the two aforementioned representative forms of BN NMs in C. elegans: BNNSs and BN-800-2. In this study, we examined the multiple phenotypic toxicities of two types of BN NMs with different morphology, size, and solubility using C. elegans in aqueous media.…”
Section: Wang Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recently conducted microarray study of C. elegans exposed to amide-single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) [24], 14 up-and 2085 down-regulated genes were reported after exposure to L1 stage C. elegans at 500 mg/L for 48 h. In our study, 983 up-and 1267 down-regulated genes were observed for young adults exposed to 1 mg/L for 24 h. It is difficult to compare microarray result from independent experiments, as differences in DEGs may be influenced by differences in the specific biological systems, array platforms and statistical methods. The number of up-regulated genes was much higher in our study as compared to that in the SWCNT study [24], which may be due to the fact that our exposure conditions reflected a relatively mild stress response, whereas the exposure conditions of the SWCNT study induced a much more severe stress responses, which was more likely to lead to transcriptional shut-down.…”
Section: Microarray and Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%