2009
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.825.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Characterization of Pistacia Genus by Microsatellite Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
6
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the comparison of gene diversity between different groups yielded significant differences among them (p \ 0.0001), confirming the results of other researchers in separating the different Pistacia species Pazouki et al 2009;Vendramin et al 2009). Cluster analysis of the Pistacia accessions according to their species constructed with UPGMA method based on a coancestry coefficient data matrix (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the comparison of gene diversity between different groups yielded significant differences among them (p \ 0.0001), confirming the results of other researchers in separating the different Pistacia species Pazouki et al 2009;Vendramin et al 2009). Cluster analysis of the Pistacia accessions according to their species constructed with UPGMA method based on a coancestry coefficient data matrix (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To distinguish various species and accessions of Pistacia, phylogenetic analysis of the genus has been attempted using isozyme (Rovira et al 1995); RAPD (Hormaza et al 1998;Kafkas and Perl-Treves 2001;Katsiotis et al 2003;Mirzaei et al 2005); restriction analysis, RFLP of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) Badenes 1997, 1998); AFLP (GolanGoldhirsh et al 2004;Ahmadi Afzadi et al 2007); SSR Vendramin et al 2009;Pazouki et al 2009Pazouki et al , 2010 and ISSR markers (Noroozi et al 2009). Molecular markers are valuable tools for screening plant morphological and phenotypic characteristics on the grounds that they are ample and independent of tissue or environmental effects that permit trait identification due to diverse appearances at the early stage of crop development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on P. vera have focused on limited SSR and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers development for germplasm characterization and sex determination [ 11 – 14 ], as well as the study of some physiological parameters in pistachio plants under drought and salt stresses [ 15 18 ]. However, there is no transcriptomic research and gene discovery at the large scale in this species, and in Anacardiaceae family only two RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) datasets are available from Mangifera indica [ 19 ] and P. chinensis [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following year the same research group was experienced 32 arbitrary primers for RAPD analysis and mentioned FPK 106 and FPK 105 but there was no data related to primer sequence. Vedramin et al carried out the SSR study covering 4 species [51]. Their analysis contains 50 P. vera, 4 P. integerrima, 12 P. mutica and 16 P. terebinthus for a total of 82 accessions but the tested markers were insu cient for gender base discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%