Abstract:Human rhinoviruses (HRVs), which are the most frequent causative agents of acute upper respiratory tract infections, are abundant worldwide. We have identified HRV strains in environmental specimens collected in Finland, Latvia and Slovakia during the surveillance of polioand other enteroviruses. These acid-sensitive HRV strains were isolated under conditions optimized for growth of most of the enteroviruses, i.e. in stationary human rhabdomyosarcoma cells incubated at 36 6C. Phylogenetic analysis of the seque… Show more
“…The frequent detection and high viral loads of HRV in fecal samples in the current study is consistent with the frequent detection of HRV by virus isolation during environmental screening of human sewage [Blomqvist et al, 2009]. It was speculated that the HRV variants derived from respiratory secretions carried into sewage by discarded used tissues or in wastewater.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Experimentally, HRVs differ from enteroviruses in being inactivated at pH of <5 as well as pH values above 9–10. For this reason, HRV detection in fecal samples or sewage has generally been attributed in the past to swallowed respiratory secretions [Blomqvist et al, 2009]. In our opinion, this is unlikely for two reasons; firstly, the acid lability of HRVs that destroys their infectivity when passing through the stomach would lead to HRV RNA degradation if the virion capsid was breached.…”
Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) can be divided into three species; HRV-A to HRV-C. Up to 148 different HRV (sero)types have been identified to date. Because of sequence similarity between 5'-NCR of HRVs and enteroviruses (EVs), it is problematic to design EV-specific RT-PCR assays. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of false-detection of different rhinoviruses by EV RT-PCR, and to evaluate the diagnostic and clinical significance of such cross-reactivity. In vitro RNA transcripts of HRV A-C created from cDNA templates were quantified spectrophotometrically. Six hundred twenty-one stool samples screened as part of routine diagnostic for EV, 17 EV-positive stool samples referred for typing, 288 stool samples submitted for gastroenteritis investigations, and 1,500 CSF samples were included in the study. EV-specific RT-PCR detected RNA transcripts of HRV-A1b, HRV-B14, and HRV-Crpat18 but with 10-1,000 reduced sensitivity compared to EV transcripts. Screening fecal samples by EV RT-PCR identified 13 positive samples identified subsequently as rhinoviruses; a further 26 HRV-positive samples were identified by nested HRV RT-PCR. All individuals were hospitalized and presented mostly with diarrhea. A total of 26 HRV types were identified (HRV-A: 46%; HRV-B: 13%; HRV-C: 41%). Results confirm that EV-specific RT-PCR can detect HRVs, and at a practical level, identify potential problems of interpretation if fecal samples are used for surrogate screening in cases of suspected viral meningitis. High detection frequencies (10%) and viral loads in stool samples provide evidence for enteric replication of HRV, and its association with enteric disease requires further etiological studies.
“…The frequent detection and high viral loads of HRV in fecal samples in the current study is consistent with the frequent detection of HRV by virus isolation during environmental screening of human sewage [Blomqvist et al, 2009]. It was speculated that the HRV variants derived from respiratory secretions carried into sewage by discarded used tissues or in wastewater.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Experimentally, HRVs differ from enteroviruses in being inactivated at pH of <5 as well as pH values above 9–10. For this reason, HRV detection in fecal samples or sewage has generally been attributed in the past to swallowed respiratory secretions [Blomqvist et al, 2009]. In our opinion, this is unlikely for two reasons; firstly, the acid lability of HRVs that destroys their infectivity when passing through the stomach would lead to HRV RNA degradation if the virion capsid was breached.…”
Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) can be divided into three species; HRV-A to HRV-C. Up to 148 different HRV (sero)types have been identified to date. Because of sequence similarity between 5'-NCR of HRVs and enteroviruses (EVs), it is problematic to design EV-specific RT-PCR assays. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of false-detection of different rhinoviruses by EV RT-PCR, and to evaluate the diagnostic and clinical significance of such cross-reactivity. In vitro RNA transcripts of HRV A-C created from cDNA templates were quantified spectrophotometrically. Six hundred twenty-one stool samples screened as part of routine diagnostic for EV, 17 EV-positive stool samples referred for typing, 288 stool samples submitted for gastroenteritis investigations, and 1,500 CSF samples were included in the study. EV-specific RT-PCR detected RNA transcripts of HRV-A1b, HRV-B14, and HRV-Crpat18 but with 10-1,000 reduced sensitivity compared to EV transcripts. Screening fecal samples by EV RT-PCR identified 13 positive samples identified subsequently as rhinoviruses; a further 26 HRV-positive samples were identified by nested HRV RT-PCR. All individuals were hospitalized and presented mostly with diarrhea. A total of 26 HRV types were identified (HRV-A: 46%; HRV-B: 13%; HRV-C: 41%). Results confirm that EV-specific RT-PCR can detect HRVs, and at a practical level, identify potential problems of interpretation if fecal samples are used for surrogate screening in cases of suspected viral meningitis. High detection frequencies (10%) and viral loads in stool samples provide evidence for enteric replication of HRV, and its association with enteric disease requires further etiological studies.
“…One possible explanation could be that human rhinoviruses derived from respiratory secretions were carried into the canal by discarded used tissues or leaking sewage. More recently, the identification of HRV‐A in sewage specimens collected from Finland, Latvia and Slovakia has been reported for the first time (Blomqvist et al. 2009).…”
Aims: To study the virological quality of surface water from highly urbanized tropical water catchment areas and to determine predominant enteric viral genotypes in surface water.
Methods and Results: A wide range of human pathogenic viruses in urban surface waters was screened by nested PCR assays after concentration by ultrafiltration. Among the 84 water samples collected, at least one virus was detected in 70 (83·3%) of these samples. Noroviruses were determined to be the most prevalent enteric viruses detected in urban surface water samples, followed by astroviruses, enteroviruses, adenoviruses and hepatitis A viruses. The molecular characterization of environmental viral isolates suggested co‐circulation of multiple genotypes of both noroviruses GI and GII, astroviruses and enteroviruses in urban surface waters.
Conclusions: Human enteric viruses with great genetic diversity were detected in surface waters, indicating the presence of human origin of faecal contamination in highly urbanized water catchment areas.
Significance and Impact of the Study: The present study identifies and characterizes potential viral hazards of source waters for drinking water supply and recreational activities. This will enable scientific decisions to be made regarding the selection and prioritization of human pathogenic viruses to be included in the future risk assessment and treatment evaluation for water and wastewater.
“…Predictions of infrequent recombination among the HRVs [ 83 ] have been made based on examination of the available set of HRV coding and noncoding regions [ 152 ]. Intensive analyses reported that recombination is not a driving force for the evolution of HRV types [ 144 , 153 , 154 ].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.