2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of CPS1 deletions by array CGH

Abstract: CPSI deficiency usually results in severe hyperammonemia presenting in the first days of life warranting prompt diagnosis. Most CPS1 defects are non-recurrent, private mutations, including point mutation, small insertions and deletions. In this study, we report the detection of large deletions varying from 1.4 kb to >130 kb in the CPS1 gene of 4 unrelated patients by targeted array CGH. These results underscore the importance of analysis of large deletions when only one mutation or no mutations are identified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported before, 11 distribution of CPS1 mutations shows predominance of the catalytic domains (116 of 172 mutations): the bicarbonate phosphorylation domain (exons [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] was affected by 61 mutations and the carbamate phosphorylation domain (exons 25-34) by 55 mutations ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As reported before, 11 distribution of CPS1 mutations shows predominance of the catalytic domains (116 of 172 mutations): the bicarbonate phosphorylation domain (exons [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] was affected by 61 mutations and the carbamate phosphorylation domain (exons 25-34) by 55 mutations ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…More than 230 CPS1 mutations are currently reported . Molecular genetic investigation for CPS1D can use different methods: exon per exon sequencing (direct Sanger sequencing), next generation sequencing (NGS) as part of a (often custom‐made) gene panel or whole exome or whole genome sequencing with or without the analysis of copy number variation (CNV), and RNA analysis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the variants, 81 (30.7%) were predicted to cause protein truncation, including 22 nonsense, 31 small deletions, 16 small insertions, 4 small indels, 6 splicing site changes, and 2 large deletions. Our reviewing data further clarified that most CPS1 variants (≥90%) were “private” with non-recurrence, and the few recurrent mutations tended to occur at CpG dinucleotides, which made the diagnosis more complicated ( Supplementary Tables S1 to S4 ) (Hoshide et al, 1993; Finckh et al, 1998; Summar et al, 1998; Ihara et al, 1999; Aoshima et al, 2001a; Aoshima et al, 2001b; Rapp et al, 2001; Wakutani et al, 2001; Häberle et al, 2003; Eeds et al, 2006; Kurokawa et al, 2007; Khayat, 2009; Ono et al, 2009; Pekkala et al, 2010; Häberle et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2011; Funghini et al, 2012; Kretz et al, 2012; Diez-Fernandez et al, 2014; Ali et al, 2016; Choi et al, 2017; Rokicki et al, 2017; Yang et al, 2017; Chen et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To detect copy number variations, two well established techniques are used. The method of CGH array [103,104] is able to detect copy number variations by measuring the fluorescence ratio between a reference and a sample, while the method of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is able to detect genomic deletions and insertions of single nucleotides up to one or more entire exons.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%