New Horizons in Insect Science: Towards Sustainable Pest Management 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2089-3_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Characterization and Management of Shoot and Fruit Borer Conogethes punctiferalis Guenee (Crambidae: Lepidoptera) Populations Infesting Cardamom, Castor and Other Hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Honda and Mitsuhashi identified and distinguished the difference between these pests in the adults, larvae and pupal stages [8]; Konno et al reported that they were different species from their response to different spectra of host-plant constituents [9]; In 2006, the pinaceae-feeding type was named as C. pinicolalis [10]. Though these studies have provided important information regarding the identification of species, it is not entirely reliable because these insect groups were undergoing speciation, genomic changes, or evolving into new taxon [11]. Therefore, for its high reliability, molecular characterization technique can serve as a complementary method for further analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, Honda and Mitsuhashi identified and distinguished the difference between these pests in the adults, larvae and pupal stages [8]; Konno et al reported that they were different species from their response to different spectra of host-plant constituents [9]; In 2006, the pinaceae-feeding type was named as C. pinicolalis [10]. Though these studies have provided important information regarding the identification of species, it is not entirely reliable because these insect groups were undergoing speciation, genomic changes, or evolving into new taxon [11]. Therefore, for its high reliability, molecular characterization technique can serve as a complementary method for further analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, DNA sequencing and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been successfully used to deal with the species uncertainty in morphological taxonomy [12][13][14]. For example, Shashank integration of conventional taxonomy, DNA bar code and others methods successfully confirmed the difference in populations of Conogethes which reared on castor and cardamom in India [11]. Furthermore, Wang et al used mitochondrial DNA sequencing technique to verify C. pinicolalis and C. punctiferalis were significantly different species [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, DNA sequencing and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been successfully used to deal with the species uncertainty in morphological taxonomy [12][13][14]. For example, Shashank integration of conventional taxonomy, DNA bar code and others methods successfully confirmed the difference in populations of Conogethes which reared on castor and cardamom in India [11]. Furthermore, Wang et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Honda and Mitsuhashi identified and distinguished the difference between these pests in the adults, larvae and pupal stages [8]; Konno et al reported that they were different species from their response to different spectra of host-plant constituents [9]; In the end, the pinaceae-feeding type was named as C. pinicolalis in 2006 [10]. Though these studies have provided important information regarding the identification of species, it is not entirely reliable because these insect groups were undergoing speciation, genomic changes, or evolving into new taxon [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%