1998
DOI: 10.1007/pl00008706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization and delineation of subtle deletions in de novo “balanced” chromosomal rearrangements

Abstract: To test the hypothesis that the phenotypic abnormalities seen in cases with apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements are the result of the presence of cryptic deletions or duplications of chromosomal material near the breakpoints, we analyzed three cases with apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements and phenotypic abnormalities. We characterized the breakpoints in these cases by using microsatellite analysis by polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of yeast artif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine whether these families were linked to one of the six known MCPH loci, we selected a minimum of three microsatellite markers from each of the candidate regions of these loci and genotyped all available individuals from these nine families (2,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Microsatellite markers used for genotyping were: D8S1798, D8S277, D8S1819, and D8S1825 for the MCPH1 locus; D19S226, D19S416, D19S245, D19S425, D19S224, D19S570, D19S881, D19S400, D19S420, and D19S418 for the (18). Radiolabeled polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide-sequencing gels and were either subjected to Phosphor Image analysis or exposed to X-ray films.…”
Section: Chromosome Analysis and Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine whether these families were linked to one of the six known MCPH loci, we selected a minimum of three microsatellite markers from each of the candidate regions of these loci and genotyped all available individuals from these nine families (2,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Microsatellite markers used for genotyping were: D8S1798, D8S277, D8S1819, and D8S1825 for the MCPH1 locus; D19S226, D19S416, D19S245, D19S425, D19S224, D19S570, D19S881, D19S400, D19S420, and D19S418 for the (18). Radiolabeled polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide-sequencing gels and were either subjected to Phosphor Image analysis or exposed to X-ray films.…”
Section: Chromosome Analysis and Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal translocations, which appear balanced on standard cytogenetic analyses, may in some cases be associated with cryptic deletions near the breakpoints [Kumar et al, 1998]. In addition to the t(2;7) translocation visible on standard karyotype analysis, our patient may have had a separate, underlying genetic mechanism that contributed to the formation of his anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements were reported in many Mendelian disorders and have assisted in the subsequent localization and cloning of the responsible disease genes [Tommerup, 1993]. In addition to direct disruption of a gene, cryptic microdeletions were described at the breakpoints of apparently balanced translocations and may be the causative mutational mechanism [Kumar et al, 1998]. Microduplications or position effects related to the translocations also could potentially be involved in the pathogenesis of these cases [Tommerup, 1993].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%