2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characteristics of established trophoblast-derived cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Park et al (2018) showed that the use of L-NAME (100 μM/mL) did not significantly alter the protein expression of the PGR-B in human placenta-derived cytotrophoblast-like BeWo cells treated for 24 h under hypoxic conditions in vitro [ 92 ]. Although our data align with the findings of Zhang et al (2018) regarding the lack of STAT3 activation in the L-NAME-treated placentae [ 91 ], it is likely that the cellular and molecular discrepancies between the HTR-8/SVneo cells and the BeWo cells particularly their downstream PGR-mediated responses [ 93 , 94 ], may have accounted for the differences in the L-NAME-mediated alterations in the PGR expression reported in the present study and that of Park et al (2018) [ 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, Park et al (2018) showed that the use of L-NAME (100 μM/mL) did not significantly alter the protein expression of the PGR-B in human placenta-derived cytotrophoblast-like BeWo cells treated for 24 h under hypoxic conditions in vitro [ 92 ]. Although our data align with the findings of Zhang et al (2018) regarding the lack of STAT3 activation in the L-NAME-treated placentae [ 91 ], it is likely that the cellular and molecular discrepancies between the HTR-8/SVneo cells and the BeWo cells particularly their downstream PGR-mediated responses [ 93 , 94 ], may have accounted for the differences in the L-NAME-mediated alterations in the PGR expression reported in the present study and that of Park et al (2018) [ 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Further studies are required to corroborate these findings. In addition, this work has several limitations, including the lack of a causative link between PE progression and defective cilia, small numbers of PE and control samples, term PE instead of early PE placenta-derived hCV-MSCs for functional analysis, and usage of the HTR cell line, which has been reported as a less valid cell model for human EVTs [ 82 ]. Finally, it is important to study the precise molecular mechanisms, how PE affects the formation and function of primary cilia on pMSCs, and how impaired pMSCs interact with and affect various placental cells in PE placentas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse systems are available to decipher placental function and its impact on pregnancy pathologies [ 4 , 11 , 13 , 20 ]. In vitro culture of isolated primary cells, transfected primary cell lines, or choriocarcinoma cell lines represent useful and simple methods [ 21 ]; however, they do not reflect the in vivo micro-environment of cells in a tissue [ 11 ]. A prominent and well-established method to look at tissues in vitro is represented by placental dual lobe perfusion [ 22 ], which enables the analysis of diverse experimental hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%