2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-017-1417-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterisation of plant parasitic nematode Longidorus poessneckensis Altherr, 1974 (Nematoda: Longidoridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our results, Zhou et al (2013) reported low divergence (2.80%) in B. schroederi and a significant, high level of gene flow in 44 samples from genetically distinct giant panda populations from three mountain ranges using a barcoding method on the cytochrome b mitochondrial gene. A separate study on the plantparasitic nematode, Longidorus poessneckensis, also showed similar findings (Kornobis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Similar to our results, Zhou et al (2013) reported low divergence (2.80%) in B. schroederi and a significant, high level of gene flow in 44 samples from genetically distinct giant panda populations from three mountain ranges using a barcoding method on the cytochrome b mitochondrial gene. A separate study on the plantparasitic nematode, Longidorus poessneckensis, also showed similar findings (Kornobis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our phylogenetic analyses using ribosomal and mitochondrial markers, revealed the higher number of cladogenesis events happen using COI marker, separating the populations of the species to four sub-clades in the corresponding phylogeny, in accordance with the results of the network analyses. This marker has already been proven as a useful tool in taxonomy of the Xiphinema americanum -group members [85,86] and has been recently used for population analyses and haplotype networking studies of Longidorus orientalis Loof, 1982 [87,88] and Longidorus poessneckensis Altherr, 1974 [89,90]. In the latter study, a 17.1% intraspecies variation was observed for this marker, and a comparison with intraspecies variation was performed with some other species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%