2020
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.22883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Breast Cancer Imaging in the Era of Precision Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, PET/MRI systems are increasingly being utilized for evaluation of disease extent or treatment response in breast cancer [ 66 , 93 ]. Breast-specific PET imaging using positron emission mammography (PEM) or dedicated breast PET systems (dbPET) have also been proposed for breast cancer imaging [ 72 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. These typically offer improved PET resolution compared with whole-body PET cameras, may allow imaging in the prone position similar to breast MRI, and allow PET guidance for tissue biopsy [ 66 , 97 ].…”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, PET/MRI systems are increasingly being utilized for evaluation of disease extent or treatment response in breast cancer [ 66 , 93 ]. Breast-specific PET imaging using positron emission mammography (PEM) or dedicated breast PET systems (dbPET) have also been proposed for breast cancer imaging [ 72 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. These typically offer improved PET resolution compared with whole-body PET cameras, may allow imaging in the prone position similar to breast MRI, and allow PET guidance for tissue biopsy [ 66 , 97 ].…”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incremental cancer detection rate per 1,000 exams in individuals with dense breasts is approximately 1.7 for tomosynthesis, 2.7 for ultrasound, 15 for full-protocol MRI, and 10 for abbreviated MRI (15). MBI also provides favorable false-positive rates (20), favorable recall rates (8), rapid interpretation times (18), low cost (15), few contraindications (21), and a high negative predictive value (22). Disadvantages of MBI for supplemental screening include an imaging exam time of 28-40 min (15), the need for nuclear medicine licensing and coordination between nuclear medicine and breast imaging sections, lack of widespread availability, variable insurance coverage, and a higher whole-body radiation exposure than for other supplemental screening options (10,13,15).…”
Section: Indications and Clinical Applications Supplemental Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used for supplemental screening, the estimated benefit of MBI in terms of deaths averted is 5-9 times greater than the estimated risk of lives lost (23), and the estimated benefit-to-radiation risk ratio now approaches that of mammography (23). However, concerns regarding MBI radiation risks, though disputed, have delayed widespread use for supplemental screening (10,21,23). The American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria for supplemental breast cancer screening based on breast density currently do not recommend MBI (24).…”
Section: Indications and Clinical Applications Supplemental Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer became the number one killer of women . Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive takes up the highest ratio (∼70%–80%) in breast malignancies . Hence, it is highly crucial and necessary for an ER accurate diagnosis, which guides hormone therapy planning and prognosis .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive takes up the highest ratio (∼70%−80%) in breast malignancies. 2 Hence, it is highly crucial and necessary for an ER accurate diagnosis, which guides hormone therapy planning and prognosis. 3 Tumors with a high expression of ERs are usually administered with an antiestrogen hormone therapy and tend to have a good prognosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%