2009
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819267fb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular biology of inflammation and sepsis: A primer*

Abstract: Many of these basic discoveries have direct implications for the clinical management of sepsis. The translation of these "bench-to-bedside" findings into new therapeutic strategies is already underway. This brief review provides the clinician with a primer into the basic mechanisms responsible for the molecular biology of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
271
1
24

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
2
271
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Central to apoptosis are caspases, which are cysteine proteases that degrade cellular proteins and nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB), a transcription factor that activates the transcription of both proapoptotic and prosurvival genes. Whereas hyper‐inflammatory responses of sepsis require NF‐κB for the production of proinflammatory cytokines and the activation by caspase cleavage, both NF‐κB and caspases concurrently induce the apoptosis of immune cells 3. Consistent with this, a concurrent apoptotic response has been shown to be present in sepsis in association with the proinflammatory response 13…”
Section: Mechanism Of Sepsis‐induced Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Central to apoptosis are caspases, which are cysteine proteases that degrade cellular proteins and nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB), a transcription factor that activates the transcription of both proapoptotic and prosurvival genes. Whereas hyper‐inflammatory responses of sepsis require NF‐κB for the production of proinflammatory cytokines and the activation by caspase cleavage, both NF‐κB and caspases concurrently induce the apoptosis of immune cells 3. Consistent with this, a concurrent apoptotic response has been shown to be present in sepsis in association with the proinflammatory response 13…”
Section: Mechanism Of Sepsis‐induced Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This initial immune recognition response is mediated by pathogen‐associated molecular patterns and damage‐associated molecular patterns originating from bacterial or fungal organisms that blind pattern recognition receptors expressed on innate immune cells 3. The activation of pattern recognition receptors results in the production of numerous proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, and interferon (IFN)‐γ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines that induce excessive hyper‐inflammatory responses and counter‐responses.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Sepsis‐induced Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the injury/ infection is excessive, however, the response may disseminate into the systemic inflammatory response syndrome with the potential for causing distant organ dysfunction [1,2]. Hence, the mechanisms underlying this potentially lethal transition are, to a large extent, the consequence of the collateral damage imposed by an exaggerated host response [3,4]. Major surgical procedures and severe infections may provoke this transition from normal and beneficial inflammation to catastrophic scenarios [5], but the exact mechanisms underlying this transition remain poorly understood and warrant further investigation, particularly with regard to the molecular biology of acute inflammation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathophysiology of sepsis-associated DIC is very complex and has been exhaustively examinated. The major occurrence is the systemic inflammatory reaction to the infectious agent (Tsujimoto et al, 2008;Cinel & Opal, 2009). This syndrome may be promoted by the microorganism expressing unique cellular components, known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%