2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular biogeochemistry of sulfate reduction, methanogenesis and the anaerobic oxidation of methane at Gulf of Mexico cold seeps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
200
4
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
27
200
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rates were sustained over a range of in situ temperatures (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1), suggesting this process is widespread in FWW systems throughout the year. Strikingly, the FWW rates are comparable in magnitude with those documented in marine systems 35,52 . AOM rates were similar to or exceeded rates of methane production from acetate and hydrogen (the two major methanogenic substrates 53 ) within the depth range assayed (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rates were sustained over a range of in situ temperatures (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1), suggesting this process is widespread in FWW systems throughout the year. Strikingly, the FWW rates are comparable in magnitude with those documented in marine systems 35,52 . AOM rates were similar to or exceeded rates of methane production from acetate and hydrogen (the two major methanogenic substrates 53 ) within the depth range assayed (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Rates of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis ( 14 CH 4 from H 14 CO 3 À ) and acetoclastic methanogenesis ( 14 CH 4 from 2-14 CH 3 COO À ) were performed, processed and calculated using previously published methods 52 . The recovery rate of labelled methane was 495%.…”
Section: (Hplc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) provide evidence for methanogenesis in Batumi surface sediments. Methanogenesis in sulfate-bearing sediments was previously verified in the Pacific Ocean (Parkes et al, 2005), in the Gulf of Mexico (Orcutt et al, 2005(Orcutt et al, , 2008, and in the Northwestern Black Sea (Knab et al, 2008), as well as during in vitro studies on AOM-performing microbial consortia under the presence of methane and sulfate (Seifert et al, 2006;Treude et al, 2007). Therefore, we conclude that AOM in surface sediments of the Batumi seep area is spatially accompanied by microbial formation of 13 C-depleted methane, which in type I ss gas over-compensates a general 13 C-enrichement in methane left from the AOM.…”
Section: Methane Consumption and Production In Shallow Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Sulfatereduction rates determined at such sites often exceeded the rates attributed to anaerobic oxidation of methane by several fold (Bowles et al, 2011), and have been proposed to be due to oxidation of hydrocarbons other than methane, including shortchain alkanes Kallmeyer and Boetius 2004;Orcutt et al, 2005Orcutt et al, , 2010Niemann et al, 2006;Kleindienst et al, 2012). Propane-and butane-degrading sulfate reducers may contribute significantly to the excess sulfate-reduction rates, and could have an important role for the in situ carbon and sulfur cycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%