2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep34333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular basis of the interaction between gating modifier spider toxins and the voltage sensor of voltage-gated ion channels

Abstract: Voltage-sensor domains (VSDs) are modular transmembrane domains of voltage-gated ion channels that respond to changes in membrane potential by undergoing conformational changes that are coupled to gating of the ion-conducting pore. Most spider-venom peptides function as gating modifiers by binding to the VSDs of voltage-gated channels and trapping them in a closed or open state. To understand the molecular basis underlying this mode of action, we used nuclear magnetic resonance to delineate the atomic details … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
78
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the sequence analysis our data would support a model where the peptide binds to residues within the cavity formed between the four helices of the VSD II [39]. This model would suggest that there is a large interface between the peptide and the channel, indicating that it should in theory be possible to develop subtype selective peptides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…From the sequence analysis our data would support a model where the peptide binds to residues within the cavity formed between the four helices of the VSD II [39]. This model would suggest that there is a large interface between the peptide and the channel, indicating that it should in theory be possible to develop subtype selective peptides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The first of these is in the S1-S2 region of the channel, while the other four are in the S3-S4 region, placing the toxin inside the cavity formed between the four helices of the VSD (note that none of these correspond to the conserved residues shown in Figure 2). This mode of binding is also consistent with recent solution state and mutagenesis studies of other related systems [36,48]. Given that we have in Table 2 Table 2 based on how many of the EELDE motif they have (allowing D to E mutations and L to A/I/V mutations), and we apply a strict filter requiring the final acidic residue (as shown by previous studies to be required) we arrive at the data summarised in Table 3.…”
Section: Hwtx-iv Sensitive Vsdssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This value would represent the equilibrium dissociation constant between the lipid partitioned ligand and the lipid embedded receptor. Remarkably, however, the value is in good agreement with equilibrium dissociation constants measured between micelle embedded receptors and free ligands [48,55,64].…”
Section: 'Membrane Catalysis' As a Kinetic Model For Contribution Of supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early studies suggested a dominant role for the extracellular S3-S4 loop in GMT binding (7,8), but subsequent studies have revealed a key role for the S1-S2 loop in many GMT interactions (4,9,10). More recent studies suggest that GMTs nestle into an extracellularfacing cavity between the S1 and S4 helices, enabling them to act as a wedge that impedes voltage sensor movement (5,11). It has been suggested that large GMTs such as those found in scorpion venom might be able to simultaneously contact the VSD and the extracellular loop connecting the pore helix P2 and the S6 segment in pore domain (12), but no studies to date have predicted a role for any of the poredomain membrane helices in GMT binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%