ABSTRACT:Recent attention has been given to the potential roles that metabolites could play in safety evaluations of new drugs. In 2002, a proposal was published on "metabolites in safety testing" ("MIST , which suggested some guidelines regarding when it is necessary to provide greater assessment of the safety of metabolites. However, this proposal was based on relative abundance values, i.e., the percentage that a metabolite comprises of total exposure to drug-related material."In the present commentary, we propose that absolute abundance criteria be used rather than relative abundance. The absolute abundance of a metabolite in circulation or excreta in humans should be combined with other information regarding the chemical structure of the metabolite (e.g., similarity to the parent drug, presence of chemically reactive substituents) and potential mechanisms of toxicity (e.g., suprapharmacological effects, secondary pharmacological effects, nonspecific effects). Decision trees are described that can be used to address human metabolites in safety testing.Much attention has been given to the potential role that metabolites of drugs may contribute to drug-induced toxicity. Since possible mechanisms of toxicity are myriad and in many cases complex, gaining an understanding of the role that drug metabolites can contribute to this process is even more challenging than it is for the parent drug. It is not uncommon to speculate that a metabolite(s) could be responsible when toxicity is observed, either in toxicology studies conducted in laboratory animal species or as side effects in clinical trials. This speculation is particularly tempting when the toxicity observed has no apparent link to the target pharmacological mechanism. Such speculations often outnumber and dwarf the number of times that a metabolite is the actual cause. For instance, many publications have linked the teratogenesis associated with phenytoin to metabolites such as epoxides (Martz et al., 1977;Finnell et al., 1992;Raymond et al., 1995). When the pharmacology of the drug is fully considered, it is an I Kr channel blocker (hERG ED 50 ϳ100 M), in addition to its primary activity against the sodium channel (IC 50 ϳ47 M) (Nobile and Vercellino, 1997;Salvati et al., 1999). I Kr channel blockers, at concentrations not affecting the adult, cause bradycardia, arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest in the fetus, leading to hypoxia, reoxygenation and alterations in embryonic blood flow. These effects can lead to growth retardation, orofacial clefts, distal digital reduction, and cardiovascular defects (Salvati et al., 1999;Danielsson et al., 2001). Thus, phenytoin serves as an example in which it is tempting to propose that a metabolite is responsible for toxicity but that, in actuality, the toxicity is caused by the parent drug acting at a nontarget receptor.A drug can yield dozens of metabolites, and it is not a common practice to measure exposure to these metabolites in toxicology studies conducted early in the drug development process; besides, at this early ...