2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep33028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular archeological evidence in support of the repeated loss of a papillomavirus gene

Abstract: It is becoming clear that, in addition to gene gain, the loss of genes may be an important evolutionary mechanism for many organisms. However, gene loss is often associated with an increased mutation rate, thus quickly erasing evidence from the genome. The analysis of evolutionarily related sequences can provide empirical evidence for gene loss events. This paper analyzes the sequences of over 300 genetically distinct papillomaviruses and provides evidence for a role of gene loss during the evolution of certai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, none of them were identified in a variety of 653 cutaneous samples with the same testing approach [21]. These results, together with previously published findings [13,17,26,28,[40][41][42][43], suggest the possible adaptation of the mentioned HPV types to the mucosal epithelium [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Interestingly, none of them were identified in a variety of 653 cutaneous samples with the same testing approach [21]. These results, together with previously published findings [13,17,26,28,[40][41][42][43], suggest the possible adaptation of the mentioned HPV types to the mucosal epithelium [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…SfPV1 contains an ORF within E6 that is similar to the HPV and BPV1 E5 proteins and was previously designated E8 (29); it is also renamed E10. Finally, members of Gammapapillomavirus species 6 (HPV101, 103 and 108) lack a canonical E6 ORF, but potentially encode a highly hydrophobic (E5-like) protein from an overlapping open reading frame, now also designated E10 (9). …”
Section: Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this core set of proteins, most viruses encode for E6 and E7 proteins, which optimize the cellular milieu for the viral life cycle (6,7). Certain viruses also express small, hydrophobic proteins that are designated E5 (8) or E10 (9). The highly divergent, yet highly expressed, E4 protein is imprinted within the E2 open reading frame (ORF) (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of presence/absence of E6 and E7 in extant PVs demands an evolutionary explanation. One hypothesis proposes that the MRCA of all PVs already contained these ORFs and invokes six independent repeated loss events for E6 in different PV lineages (Van Doorslaer and McBride, 2016), including in the lineage leading to extant fish PVs, and one gene loss event for E7 in another PV lineage. An alternative hypothesis, more parsimonious with the absence of E6 and E7 in fish PVs, proposes an ancestral PV genome spanning only the minimal arrangement E1-E2-L2-L1, the gain of the ancestral E6 and E7 genes in the lineage of amniote PVs, at least 184 Ma, followed by five independent loss events for E6 and one loss event for E7.…”
Section: Inconsistencies Of the Current Scenario Of Pvs Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%