2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular approaches to the assessment of biodiversity in aquatic microbial communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because microbes have lived on Earth for more than 3 billion years, they are ubiquitous and play important roles in the Earth's ecosystems (Kowalchuk et al 2008). In particular, they participate in essential biogeochemical processes such as the carbon, nitrogen and sulphur cycles in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, are producers and decomposers in food webs (Dorigo et al 2005;Kisand et al 2012;Zehr 2010), and are primarily responsible for degradation of a large variety of natural organic compounds (Ogawa et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because microbes have lived on Earth for more than 3 billion years, they are ubiquitous and play important roles in the Earth's ecosystems (Kowalchuk et al 2008). In particular, they participate in essential biogeochemical processes such as the carbon, nitrogen and sulphur cycles in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, are producers and decomposers in food webs (Dorigo et al 2005;Kisand et al 2012;Zehr 2010), and are primarily responsible for degradation of a large variety of natural organic compounds (Ogawa et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological advances during the last three decades have greatly increased our understanding of diversity and turnover of natural bacterial communities (Ovreas, 2000;Dorigo et al, 2005) and also, more recently, about the underlying assembly mechanisms (Lindström and Langenheder, 2011). It has been shown that bacterial communities can be assembled by species sorting (Beisner et al, 2006;Van der Gucht et al, 2007;Logue and Lindströ m, 2010) as well as mass effects (Lindströ m et al, 2006;Crump et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If comparable samples collected from different locations harbor similar communities in the same area, the fingerprinting patterns are theoretically expected to be similar. To date, the fingerprinting techniques commonly used in aquatic habitats include denaturing/temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE/TGGE), single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) (see [31] for details). These methods provide a rapid means for screening microbial communities from different environments or for comparing community dynamics at different spatial/temporal scales.…”
Section: Community Fingerprinting Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%