DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-4477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and quantitative genetic basis and control of severe combined immunodeficiency and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in pigs

Abstract: First and foremost, I would like to acknowledge the love, support, and guidance of my family; without you all, I would have never made it to where I am today. Mama, you are my confidant, therapist, and most importantly, my mama. I will forever be grateful for everything that you have done for me since the day I was born. Your selflessness is endless. Dad, thank you for your guidance, advice, and help through the years. John and Ben, thank you both for always putting a smile on my face, even when times are toug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 151 publications
(229 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the PRRSV strains that pigs encounter in the field will be different from the strains used in the PHGC trials, we focused on across-strain genomic prediction of host response by training on PHGC trials that used one strain (NVSL or KS06) and validated on PHGC trials that used the other strain. The resulting accuracy of genomic prediction of VL was 0.45 when training on the KS06 data and validating on the NVLS data and 0.34 when training on the NVSL data and validating on the KS06 data (Waide, 2015). For comparison, the accuracy of predicting an animal's genetic value for a trait based on the animal's own phenotype is the square root of heritability (Falconer and MacKay, 1996), which amounts to 0.56 for NVSL and 0.71 for KS06.…”
Section: Selection For Host Response To Prrs By Whole-genome Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the PRRSV strains that pigs encounter in the field will be different from the strains used in the PHGC trials, we focused on across-strain genomic prediction of host response by training on PHGC trials that used one strain (NVSL or KS06) and validated on PHGC trials that used the other strain. The resulting accuracy of genomic prediction of VL was 0.45 when training on the KS06 data and validating on the NVLS data and 0.34 when training on the NVSL data and validating on the KS06 data (Waide, 2015). For comparison, the accuracy of predicting an animal's genetic value for a trait based on the animal's own phenotype is the square root of heritability (Falconer and MacKay, 1996), which amounts to 0.56 for NVSL and 0.71 for KS06.…”
Section: Selection For Host Response To Prrs By Whole-genome Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%