Abstract:Inflammatory outcomes, including toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) and infectious endophthalmitis, are potentially painful, blinding complications following cataract surgery. In an in vitro pilot study, commercially available, sterile foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) used during routine canine cataract surgery, and their packaging fluid were surveyed for the presence of bacterial DNA and/or viable (cultivable) bacteria. Swabs from IOLs and packaging fluid from three different veterinary manufacturers an… Show more
“…and was a 100% match to S. epidermidis . Distinct mixtures of bacterial DNA were present and consistent in IOLs and packaging fluid depending on the manufacturer, and Staphylococcus was the dominant contributor to the bacterial DNA detected 14 . Viscoelastic type was a significant factor impacting the prevalence of FW following cataract surgery in dogs 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…DNA extraction of the viscoelastic samples was performed as previously described. 14 Briefly, the bead tubes containing the viscoelastic samples were agitated using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen) and then handled according to the Qiagen manufacturer's instructions. Final DNA elutions were performed in 60 μL EB buffer (Qiagen), and the samples were plated for 16 S rRNA library preparation.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study was an in vitro investigation with a small sample size, similar to the previously reported data. 14 A power analysis was not performed, but the number of viscoelastic samples was chosen in an attempt to survey the community structure of the various manufacturers. Hyaluronidases were not utilized in the endotoxin quantification arm of this study to break down the hyaluronate molecule and improve accessibility for the LAL assay.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinct mixtures of bacterial DNA were present and consistent in IOLs and packaging fluid depending on the manufacturer, and Staphylococcus was the dominant contributor to the bacterial DNA detected. 14 Viscoelastic type was a significant factor impacting the prevalence of FW following cataract surgery in dogs. 6 A microbiota investigation of ophthalmic viscoelastic materials is the logical next step to further our understanding of FW, TASS, and infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[7][8][9][10] Limited reports in both human and veterinary literature exist regarding sequencing analysis of sterile commercial products used during cataract surgery and their relationship to post-operative endophthalmitis outbreaks. [11][12][13] A recent publication 14 describes an investigation of commonly used canine intraocular lenses and their packaging fluid. Conventional bacterial culture yielded one isolate, identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis.…”
Purpose
To survey commonly used, sterile ophthalmic viscoelastic materials used during routine cataract surgery for the presence of bacterial DNA and/or viable bacteria and endotoxin quantification.
Methods
Samples from three different ophthalmic viscoelastic manufacturers and three different production lots per manufacturer were collected for 16 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing and conventional aerobic and capnophilic bacterial culture. Other samples of viscoelastic material from the same three manufacturers were collected for endotoxin quantification using a commercially available Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. Statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Plot 14.0, and R v4.0.2.0. Differences (p ≤ .05) between sample collection sites in total DNA concentration, microbial richness, mean intra‐group distances, and endotoxin quantification alongside reagent controls were evaluated.
Results
Culture yielded two isolates, identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus megaterium. 16 S rRNA sequencing revealed no differences between brands in richness or overall composition. The most common bacterial DNA detected across all brands was Staphylococcus sp., Cutibacterium sp., Flavobacterium sp., and Lactobacillus sp. A significant difference was found between the median endotoxin concentration between Anvision and Hyvisc® viscoelastic (Anvision: 0.171 EU/mL, Hyvisc®: 0.03 EU/mL; p < .001).
Conclusions
No brand‐specific differences in bacterial DNA were detected in the viscoelastic materials. Staphylococcus, Cutibacterium, Flavobacterium, and Lactobacillus were the dominant contributors to the bacterial DNA detected. Although Anvision viscoelastic samples contained significantly more endotoxin than Hyvisc® viscoelastic samples, endotoxin concentrations were below the FDA limit of 0.2 EU/mL for both manufacturers. These data further the understanding of inflammatory outcomes following cataract surgery.
“…and was a 100% match to S. epidermidis . Distinct mixtures of bacterial DNA were present and consistent in IOLs and packaging fluid depending on the manufacturer, and Staphylococcus was the dominant contributor to the bacterial DNA detected 14 . Viscoelastic type was a significant factor impacting the prevalence of FW following cataract surgery in dogs 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…DNA extraction of the viscoelastic samples was performed as previously described. 14 Briefly, the bead tubes containing the viscoelastic samples were agitated using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen) and then handled according to the Qiagen manufacturer's instructions. Final DNA elutions were performed in 60 μL EB buffer (Qiagen), and the samples were plated for 16 S rRNA library preparation.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study was an in vitro investigation with a small sample size, similar to the previously reported data. 14 A power analysis was not performed, but the number of viscoelastic samples was chosen in an attempt to survey the community structure of the various manufacturers. Hyaluronidases were not utilized in the endotoxin quantification arm of this study to break down the hyaluronate molecule and improve accessibility for the LAL assay.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinct mixtures of bacterial DNA were present and consistent in IOLs and packaging fluid depending on the manufacturer, and Staphylococcus was the dominant contributor to the bacterial DNA detected. 14 Viscoelastic type was a significant factor impacting the prevalence of FW following cataract surgery in dogs. 6 A microbiota investigation of ophthalmic viscoelastic materials is the logical next step to further our understanding of FW, TASS, and infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[7][8][9][10] Limited reports in both human and veterinary literature exist regarding sequencing analysis of sterile commercial products used during cataract surgery and their relationship to post-operative endophthalmitis outbreaks. [11][12][13] A recent publication 14 describes an investigation of commonly used canine intraocular lenses and their packaging fluid. Conventional bacterial culture yielded one isolate, identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis.…”
Purpose
To survey commonly used, sterile ophthalmic viscoelastic materials used during routine cataract surgery for the presence of bacterial DNA and/or viable bacteria and endotoxin quantification.
Methods
Samples from three different ophthalmic viscoelastic manufacturers and three different production lots per manufacturer were collected for 16 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing and conventional aerobic and capnophilic bacterial culture. Other samples of viscoelastic material from the same three manufacturers were collected for endotoxin quantification using a commercially available Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. Statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Plot 14.0, and R v4.0.2.0. Differences (p ≤ .05) between sample collection sites in total DNA concentration, microbial richness, mean intra‐group distances, and endotoxin quantification alongside reagent controls were evaluated.
Results
Culture yielded two isolates, identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus megaterium. 16 S rRNA sequencing revealed no differences between brands in richness or overall composition. The most common bacterial DNA detected across all brands was Staphylococcus sp., Cutibacterium sp., Flavobacterium sp., and Lactobacillus sp. A significant difference was found between the median endotoxin concentration between Anvision and Hyvisc® viscoelastic (Anvision: 0.171 EU/mL, Hyvisc®: 0.03 EU/mL; p < .001).
Conclusions
No brand‐specific differences in bacterial DNA were detected in the viscoelastic materials. Staphylococcus, Cutibacterium, Flavobacterium, and Lactobacillus were the dominant contributors to the bacterial DNA detected. Although Anvision viscoelastic samples contained significantly more endotoxin than Hyvisc® viscoelastic samples, endotoxin concentrations were below the FDA limit of 0.2 EU/mL for both manufacturers. These data further the understanding of inflammatory outcomes following cataract surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.