1999
DOI: 10.1007/s100960050354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and Antibiogram Relationships of Acinetobacter Isolates from Two Contrasting Hospitals in the United Kingdom and South Africa

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the molecular relationships and antibiograms of nosocomial isolates of Acinetobacter spp. from two acute-care hospitals in Nottingham, UK, and Soweto, South Africa, with different hospital infection control problems and procedures. In contrast to Nottingham, where randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting demonstrated that a single multiresistant strain of Acinetobacter baumannii has predominated in the hospital intensive care unit over an 11-year period, the Soweto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, of 15 isolates examined from a hospital in the Midlands, 13 belonged to different clusters, suggesting that there were a number of different strains circulating in this particular hospital that were capable of causing infections. Similar contrasting epidemiological relationships among Acinetobacter isolates from different geographical locations have been reported previously [15], possibly reflecting patient mix or the efficiency of different local control of infection policies and procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For example, of 15 isolates examined from a hospital in the Midlands, 13 belonged to different clusters, suggesting that there were a number of different strains circulating in this particular hospital that were capable of causing infections. Similar contrasting epidemiological relationships among Acinetobacter isolates from different geographical locations have been reported previously [15], possibly reflecting patient mix or the efficiency of different local control of infection policies and procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, these MLST approaches cannot provide a real-time surveillance capability. Furthermore, Acinetobacter infections can be the result of one of several pathogenic Acinetobacter species, including A. baumannii, Acinetobacter genomospecies 13TU, or Acinetobacter genomospecies 3 (17,35,42,45).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibiotics tested were aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, ticarcillin, amikacin, gentamicin, cipro¯oxacin, levooxacin, nor¯oxacin and o¯oxacin. Similarity coef®-cients (S AB values) were calculated and subjected to cluster analysis as described previously [19], except that MIC values rather than inhibition zone sizes were used. Aminoglycoside resistance pro®les were analysed further by a disk method, with 12 different drug analogues [20].…”
Section: Antibiotic Pro®lesmentioning
confidence: 99%