2011
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-1244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Analysis of Pheochromocytoma after Maternal Transmission of SDHD Mutation Elucidates Mechanism of Parent-of-Origin Effect

Abstract: Tumor formation can occur after maternal transmission of SDHD, a finding with important clinical implications for SDHD families. Tumor formation in SDHD mutation requires the loss of both the wild-type SDHD allele and maternal 11p15, leading to the predominant but now not exclusive pattern of disease inheritance after paternal SDHD transmission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Step 1: SDHD mutation • Step 2: Loss or mutation of the wild-type allele • Step 3: Loss of a further imprinted (paternally silenced and maternally active) tumour suppressor gene from chr11 (thought to be the H19 gene) 22 In this hypothesis, steps 2 and 3 were thought to be explained solely by the obligate loss of the maternal copy of chromosome 11 (both losses generated by one event: the complete loss of the entire maternal chromosome) and that the three-hit model was therefore caused by only two events. That scenario was concordant with the parent-of-origin effect observed, with the mutation transmitted (step 1) on the paternal allele.…”
Section: Genetics Of Pheo-pgl: Non-syndromic Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Step 1: SDHD mutation • Step 2: Loss or mutation of the wild-type allele • Step 3: Loss of a further imprinted (paternally silenced and maternally active) tumour suppressor gene from chr11 (thought to be the H19 gene) 22 In this hypothesis, steps 2 and 3 were thought to be explained solely by the obligate loss of the maternal copy of chromosome 11 (both losses generated by one event: the complete loss of the entire maternal chromosome) and that the three-hit model was therefore caused by only two events. That scenario was concordant with the parent-of-origin effect observed, with the mutation transmitted (step 1) on the paternal allele.…”
Section: Genetics Of Pheo-pgl: Non-syndromic Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That scenario was concordant with the parent-of-origin effect observed, with the mutation transmitted (step 1) on the paternal allele. However, 3 cases of affected individuals who received their mutations from their mothers have been published 22 . In one of those cases, the tumour analysis explained the phenomenon, because in addition to the maternal mutated allele, there was evidence of loss of the wild-type paternal SDHD and loss of the maternal 11p region (including the 11p15 H19 gene).…”
Section: Genetics Of Pheo-pgl: Non-syndromic Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a combination is not usually sufficient to drive tumorigenesis. In support of this hypothesis is the observation that in one case of paraganglioma after maternal transmission of a SDHD mutation, there was loss of the paternal SDHD allele and loss of the maternal 11p15.5 imprinted region (Yeap et al 2011). …”
Section: Penetrance and Genotype-phenotype Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Apart from a few exceptional cases in which clinical disease has developed after maternal transmission of a SDHD mutation (Yeap et al 2011), the risk of clinical disease after a maternal transmission appears to be extremely remote. Notably, the paraganglioma phenotype in such cases appears mild or atypical (e.g.…”
Section: Penetrance and Genotype-phenotype Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a second paternally imprinted tumor suppressor gene located elsewhere on chromosome 11 may play a decisive role in tumorigenesis, at least in PGL1 and PGL2. In the very few instances of maternal transmission of the disease in PGL1 families, not only was the SDHD or SDHAF2 gene affected but also was the 11p15 region (Pigny et al, 2008;Yeap et al, 2011). This putative tumor suppressor gene has yet to be identified.…”
Section: Sdhdmentioning
confidence: 99%