2016
DOI: 10.1642/auk-15-222.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular analysis of nestling diet in a long-distance Neotropical migrant, the Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla)

Abstract: Elucidating the diet of Neotropical migratory birds is essential to our understanding of their ecology and to their longterm conservation. Reductions in prey availability negatively impact Neotropical migrants by affecting their survival as both nestlings and adults. Beyond broad taxonomic or morphological categories, however, the diet of Neotropical migrants is poorly documented. Using the molecular techniques of DNA barcoding and next-generation sequencing, we elucidated the diet of Louisiana Waterthrush (Pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Success rates of recovering at least one prey species within a sample (97% with COI and 92% with Cytb) and those with > reads used for region/moor-type comparisons (84% with COI and 78% with Cytb) in this study are similar to previous studies using faecal samples e.g. 95% in Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla) (Trevelline et al 2016); 97% in Norway lemming (Lemmus lemmus) (Soininen et al 2013). Other studies have reported far lower success rates from faeces e.g.…”
Section: Buccal Swabs and Dietary Analysessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Success rates of recovering at least one prey species within a sample (97% with COI and 92% with Cytb) and those with > reads used for region/moor-type comparisons (84% with COI and 78% with Cytb) in this study are similar to previous studies using faecal samples e.g. 95% in Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla) (Trevelline et al 2016); 97% in Norway lemming (Lemmus lemmus) (Soininen et al 2013). Other studies have reported far lower success rates from faeces e.g.…”
Section: Buccal Swabs and Dietary Analysessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This single marker approach has been widely used in many studies (Gordon et al, ; McClenaghan, Nol, & Kerr, ; Moran, Prosser, & Moran, ), but it may produce significant biases due to differential primer affinity for different taxa. For instance, although ZBJ is often used as a ‘universal’ marker for arthropods (Crisol‐MartĂ­nez, Moreno‐Moyano, Wormington, Brown, & Stanley, ; Jedlicka, Vo, & Almeida, ; Trevelline, Latta, Marshall, Nuttle, & Porter, ; Trevelline et al, ), it may have strong positive or negative bias depending on the taxa (Clarke, Soubrier, Weyrich, & Cooper, ; Piñol, Mir, Gomez‐Polo, & AgustĂ­, ). The challenge is even worse in the case of omnivorous diets, because the variety of taxonomic clades consumed cannot be analysed using a single marker (De Barba et al, ; Taberlet et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insect abundance may be important to territory size or breeding success, but our conclusions are relative to the scale at which each predictor was measured. Second, knowing which types of insects are provisioned to offspring would establish the most appropriate sampling protocol for robustly estimating food availability in a territory (e.g., Trevelline et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%