2013
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOLE 2.0: advanced approach for analysis of biomacromolecular channels

Abstract: BackgroundChannels and pores in biomacromolecules (proteins, nucleic acids and their complexes) play significant biological roles, e.g., in molecular recognition and enzyme substrate specificity.ResultsWe present an advanced software tool entitled MOLE 2.0, which has been designed to analyze molecular channels and pores. Benchmark tests against other available software tools showed that MOLE 2.0 is by comparison quicker, more robust and more versatile. As a new feature, MOLE 2.0 estimates physicochemical prope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
269
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
269
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparative analysis among these receptors was extended considering a set of chemicalephysical parameters of the cavity residues. For this step, we followed a protocol analogue to the software Mole [61] based on the calculation of the average values based on different parameters for each considered receptor cavity. Our analysis was hence based on the employment of a set of polarity/hydrophobicity parameters [62e67] calculated for each cavity residue (again, we analysed rP2X1, rP2X3, and rP2X7) and then used to obtain the average values to be compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative analysis among these receptors was extended considering a set of chemicalephysical parameters of the cavity residues. For this step, we followed a protocol analogue to the software Mole [61] based on the calculation of the average values based on different parameters for each considered receptor cavity. Our analysis was hence based on the employment of a set of polarity/hydrophobicity parameters [62e67] calculated for each cavity residue (again, we analysed rP2X1, rP2X3, and rP2X7) and then used to obtain the average values to be compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All protein model figures were created using MacPyMOL [32]. Channel/cavity analysis was performed using the Graphical User Interface for the Mole 2.0 program on Windows [33]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5] To identify the residues of stTrpE that are involved in this channeling and that may therefore come into contact with the ammonia nucleophile,w ea pplied MOLE 2.0, ap rogram for analyzing macromolecular channels. [6] We identified a3 0-long channel connecting the active sites in stAS (Figure 2a). This channel is similar to the channel observed in the crystal structure of the homologous aminodeoxyisochorismate (ADIC) synthase PhzE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%