Mokken scaling analysis of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in individuals with cardiovascular disease

Cosco, Theodore D.; Doyle, Frank; Watson, Roger; Ward, Mark; McGee, Hannah

doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.11.005

Cited by 26 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, no real differences were seen between overall adjusted and unadjusted estimates. Fourthly, as the depression measures used in this literature may not always be able to discriminate depression from anxiety or other related negative affect states [40], [41], [42] it is unclear whether the results may also be relevant to, or indeed be confounded by, other negative affect states such as anxiety. Future research using diagnostic measures should investigate this.…”

Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 96%

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of depression on subsequent smoking cessation in patients with chronic respiratory conditions

Alnashri

Rohde

et al. 2015

General Hospital Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 96%

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of depression on subsequent smoking cessation in patients with chronic respiratory conditions

Alnashri

Rohde

et al. 2015

General Hospital Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In addition, seven studies meeting the recruitment criteria for the Cosco et al review but published since the literature search was conducted were also included [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Again, the corresponding author was contacted if the inter-item correlation matrices were not included in the publication.…”

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A meta confirmatory factor analysis

Norton

Cosco

Doyle

et al. 2013

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Self Cite

349

340

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ante esta situación, algunos autores en posiciones más extremas apuntan abandonar el estudio de la escala por su inconsistencia (Coyne y Van Sonderen, 2012). Sugieren que la estructura latente de la HAD no es clara y depende de los métodos estadísticos utilizados, observándose cierta incapacidad para diferenciar entre los constructos de ansiedad y depresión, algo que también apunta Cosco et al (2012). Respecto a la exclusión de ítems somáticos (trastornos del sueño y el apetito) se señala que no se basa en criterios clínicos confirmados (Coyne y Van Sonderen, 2012;Mitchell, Meader, y Symonds, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Revisión de estudios de la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HAD) en muestras españolas.

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen:Introducción: La escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HADS-Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Zigmond y Snaith, 1983) se ha convertido en un popular instrumento clínico diseñado para evaluar ansiedad y depresión, encontrándose evidencias de que aplicado a diversas poblaciones parece tener tan buenas propiedades de detección cómo otros instrumentos. Numerosos trabajos en muestra española comprueban sus propiedades psicométricas y puntos de corte. Nuestro objetivo es unificar los resultados de estudios realizados en muestras españolas para concretar directrices que orienten en la aplicabilidad e interpretación de sus puntuaciones. Método: Revisión bibliográfica. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 15 artículos, a) se confirma que las propiedades psicométricas del HAD en diferentes muestras son óptimas, b) se presenta cierta variabilidad de puntos de corte para cada población y c) determinados ítems muestran débil carga factorial e ítem-test. Discusión: se plantea qué ítems deben reconsiderarse para un HAD abreviado. Se sugiere valorar la escala total de distrés. Palabras clave: HAD; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; revisión; propiedades psicométricas; puntos de corte.Title: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) review in Spanish Samples. Abstract. Introduction: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) has become a popular clinical instrument designed to assess anxiety and depression. Evidence of HADS' good screening properties applied to several samples has been found. HADS seems to be as good screening properties as other tools. Different studies in Spanish sample tested its psychometric properties, including also their cut-offs points, specificity and sensitivity. Our aim is to unify the results of studies in Spanish population specifying guidelines regarding their applicability and interpretation of their cut-off points. Material and method: bibliographic review. Results: 15 articles were selected, a) HADS confirms its optimal psychometric properties in different groups, b) HADS shows some variability in proposed cut-off points for different groups, c) A number of items shown weak factor loading and item-test. Discussion: These items should be reconsidered for new proposals of a shortened final scale. We suggest attending at distress total scale.

show abstract

Mokken scaling analysis of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in individuals with cardiovascular disease

Cited by 26 publications

References 51 publications

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of depression on subsequent smoking cessation in patients with chronic respiratory conditions

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of depression on subsequent smoking cessation in patients with chronic respiratory conditions

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A meta confirmatory factor analysis

Revisión de estudios de la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria (HAD) en muestras españolas.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About