2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture sorption characteristics of lal peda at different storage temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), lal peda (Kumar et al . ) and sandesh (Sahu and Das ) might be due to the higher protein and sucrose content of the product. Sugars might have solubilized at higher temperature and resulted in lower values of monolayer moisture content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), lal peda (Kumar et al . ) and sandesh (Sahu and Das ) might be due to the higher protein and sucrose content of the product. Sugars might have solubilized at higher temperature and resulted in lower values of monolayer moisture content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), Sandesh (Sahu and Das ), Lal peda (Kumar et al . ) and milk powder and milk products (Berlin et al . ,b; Berlin ; Lomauro et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moisture sorption characteristics of various foods have been systematically reviewed and reported (Boquet et al 1978;Chirife and Iglesias 1978). Moisture sorption isotherms of various milk products including Peda (Biradar et al 1985), Chhana powder and casein (Bandyopadhyay et al 1987), Khoa (Sawhney and Cheryan 1988), Dudh churpi (Hossain et al 2002), Chhana podo (Rao et al 2006), Kheer (Kumar et al 2005), readyto-use Basundi mix (Sharma et al 2009), Sandesh (Sahu and Das 2010), Lal peda (Kumar et al 2012) and milk powder and milk products (Berlin et al 1968a,b;Berlin 1981;Lomauro et al 1985;Jouppila and Roos 1994;Bronlund and Paterson 2004;Foster et al 2005) have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moisture sorption isotherm of probiotic‐fermented sea tangle powder can be divided into three regions: (a) the low a w region ( a w < 0.2), where water molecules are adsorbed on the surface of particles as a monolayer, (b) the intermediate a w region (0.2 < a w < 0.7), where water molecules are adsorbed as additional layers over the monolayer, and (c) the high a w region ( a w > 0.7), where water molecules are condensed in the pores of the particles, followed by dissolution of soluble substances. As the particles are swollen due to the adsorption of water molecules, pores or void spaces may be newly created depending on the stability of the microstructure of the particles, in which more water molecules can be adsorbed and structurally entrapped (Kumar, Jha, Jain, Sahu, & Arora, ). A reason for the high moisture sorption capacity of probiotic‐fermented sea tangle powder, especially in the high a w region, is that the fermented sea tangle powder has a microstructure that is relatively unstable in response to water sorption compared to that of other reported fresh seaweeds; furthermore, its microstructure is altered, resulting in a more porous structure that can entrap a greater number of water molecules during the sorption process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…moisture sorption isotherm of probiotic-fermented sea tangle powder can be divided into three regions: (a) the low a w region (a w < 0.2), where water molecules are adsorbed on the surface of particles as a monolayer, (b) the intermediate a w region (0.2 < a w < 0.7),where water molecules are adsorbed as additional layers over the monolayer, and (c) the high a w region (a w > 0.7), where water molecules are condensed in the pores of the particles, followed by dissolution of soluble substances. As the particles are swollen due to the adsorption of water molecules, pores or void spaces may be newly created depending on the stability of the microstructure of the particles, in which more water molecules can be adsorbed and structurally entrapped(Kumar, Jha, Jain, Sahu, & Arora, 2012). A reason…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%